modern Conn 62H
-
MTbassbone
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:08 pm
modern Conn 62H
Anyone have one of these? I curious if Conn makes a D slide, or if its a custom job. What are the leadpipe options? Is a yellow bell available? Is a thin bell available, similar to the Conn 88HTO?
- hyperbolica
- Posts: 3880
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:31 am
Re: modern Conn 62H
Horn Guys have a good writeup on it. Looks like no yellow or T option. The thin option was necessay on the888h because newer ones used thicker metal. Elkharts are the same as the T version. So the bass might not need a special T option. Leadpipes are listed.
https://www.hornguys.com/products/conn- ... 5201&_ss=r
https://www.hornguys.com/products/conn- ... 5201&_ss=r
-
MTbassbone
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:08 pm
Re: modern Conn 62H
Anyone think its too snappy or barky for orchestra/chamber work? I don't play in a big orchestra so I am not after a huge tubish sound.
-
Bach5G
- Posts: 2706
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:10 pm
Re: modern Conn 62H
I wonder if it suffers in comparison to the original. Expectations too high?
B Reichenbach had a hand in its development, IIRC.
B Reichenbach had a hand in its development, IIRC.
-
MTbassbone
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:08 pm
Re: modern Conn 62H
I'm not worried about it being compared to the classic Elkhart versions.
-
Specialk3700
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2018 9:43 pm
Re: modern Conn 62H
It's a pretty different horn from the original. I'm not sure if that's a great comparison to make.Bach5G wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2019 8:52 am I wonder if it suffers in comparison to the original. Expectations too high?
B Reichenbach had a hand in its development, IIRC.
Engineering student with a trombone problem.
Edwards B454
Shires Bravo
Yamaha 354
Edwards B454
Shires Bravo
Yamaha 354
-
Bach5G
- Posts: 2706
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:10 pm
Re: modern Conn 62H
“It's a pretty different horn from the original. I'm not sure if that's a great comparison to make.”
That’s the point.
That’s the point.
- EOlson9
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 4:34 pm
Re: modern Conn 62H
I've been playing a modern 62H for 16 years. I really like it for musicals, concert band, jazz, trombone choir. Haven't played orchestral stuff in 14ish years. Only reason I'd want anything else would be for a great duo gravis or a single trigger bass as a lighter instrument.
2nd Trombone, Winona Brass Band
-
2bobone
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2018 1:10 pm
Re: modern Conn 62H
I have a 62HI for sale in the classified section. It looks new and I thought it was terrific when I fitted an Edwards #2 leadpipe and a Sauer brace on the lower slide. I bought a Butler cause I'm an old codger. I can send pics ---- Lemme know ! I played a 4th of July concert with a pick-up orchestra last year and the tuba player asked if I was playing an Edwards, Shires or Greenhoe. He was impressed when I revealed that it was a garden variety Conn 62H ! Cheers !! Bob
Last edited by 2bobone on Wed Aug 07, 2019 4:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- paulyg
- Posts: 685
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2018 12:30 pm
Re: modern Conn 62H
I can't think of any orchestral bass trombone parts that would benefit from sounding like a tuba...MTbassbone wrote: Sat Aug 03, 2019 8:46 am Anyone think its too snappy or barky for orchestra/chamber work? I don't play in a big orchestra so I am not after a huge tubish sound.
Best way to put it, is that the 62H sounds like a Conn, and the 50 sounds like a Bach. Unless you are a permanent member of a big 5 orchestra section (and maybe not even then), the distinction between the two is purely a matter of personal preference.
If you pull the trigger on one, definitely attempt to try the dependent version as well. Makes a positive difference as far as I'm concerned. Also, the Eastlake lacquer on mine was VERY thick, especially around the flare. My horn came to life when I stripped the lacquer. Edit: Also in regards to what Bob said about adding an Edwards leadpipe, this definitely improved my horn as well.
Paul Gilles
Aerospace Engineer & Trombone Player
Aerospace Engineer & Trombone Player
-
MTbassbone
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:08 pm
Re: modern Conn 62H
Any idea of how much it weighs? or what it might compare to in terms of weight?EOlson9 wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:17 pm I've been playing a modern 62H for 16 years. I really like it for musicals, concert band, jazz, trombone choir. Haven't played orchestral stuff in 14ish years. Only reason I'd want anything else would be for a great duo gravis or a single trigger bass as a lighter instrument.
Also anyone know if it comes with a D slide?
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6219
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
- paulyg
- Posts: 685
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2018 12:30 pm
Re: modern Conn 62H
It's not light. Before I got an Edwards slide for it, mine was pretty back-heavy too. Now it is really well balanced, and a bullet brace is all that's needed for me to hold it up as long as I want. Tuning is Bb-F-D for the dependent model.
The days of light bells are over for Conn trombones. The Gen II 62H bell is thick and has a soldered rim. Either the seam is expertly buffed out, or it is one piece. Quite a departure from the 2 piece, unsoldered rims that made the Elkhart horns so famous.
The days of light bells are over for Conn trombones. The Gen II 62H bell is thick and has a soldered rim. Either the seam is expertly buffed out, or it is one piece. Quite a departure from the 2 piece, unsoldered rims that made the Elkhart horns so famous.
Paul Gilles
Aerospace Engineer & Trombone Player
Aerospace Engineer & Trombone Player
-
tbonesullivan
- Posts: 1935
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:06 am
Re: modern Conn 62H
They are two piece, but they use a welded seam, and have for quite some time I believe. You maybe will be able to see it from inside the bell, but it will be very hard to see. Yamaha also uses welded seams on their 600 series, and I have yet to find them. Definitely less labor intensive than the standard brazed seam.paulyg wrote: Tue Aug 27, 2019 4:52 pmThe days of light bells are over for Conn trombones. The Gen II 62H bell is thick and has a soldered rim. Either the seam is expertly buffed out, or it is one piece. Quite a departure from the 2 piece, unsoldered rims that made the Elkhart horns so famous.
The Gen II Conn 88H "thin" bells still have a soldered rim, and from what I have heard, are not as thin as the elkhart version.
David S. - daveyboy37 from TTF
Bach 39, LT36B, 42BOF & 42T, King 2103 / 3b, Kanstul 1570CR & 1588CR, Yamaha YBL-612 RII, YBL-822G & YBL-830, Sterling 1056GHS Euphonium,
Livingston Symphony Orchestra NJ - Trombone
Bach 39, LT36B, 42BOF & 42T, King 2103 / 3b, Kanstul 1570CR & 1588CR, Yamaha YBL-612 RII, YBL-822G & YBL-830, Sterling 1056GHS Euphonium,
Livingston Symphony Orchestra NJ - Trombone
- paulyg
- Posts: 685
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2018 12:30 pm
Re: modern Conn 62H
Yes, and most of the fun in playing the Elkhart horns is the sensation that you're riding a rocket... which comes from how flexible and responsive they are. The new ones are "great" horns, but too safe.tbonesullivan wrote: Tue Aug 27, 2019 8:06 pm
The Gen II Conn 88H "thin" bells still have a soldered rim, and from what I have heard, are not as thin as the elkhart version.
Paul Gilles
Aerospace Engineer & Trombone Player
Aerospace Engineer & Trombone Player
- down8ve
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2018 6:31 am
Re: modern Conn 62H
I really like Paul's comment: "Too safe." Pretty much describes everything wrong with the world in my book.paulyg wrote: Tue Aug 27, 2019 9:33 pm
Yes, and most of the fun in playing the Elkhart horns is the sensation that you're riding a rocket... which comes from how flexible and responsive they are. The new ones are "great" horns, but too safe.
The astute reader will realize that the opposite of courage isn't cowardice, but conformity (Rollo May).
-Scott Moore