Rehearsal Letters
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:01 pm
- Location: USA
Rehearsal Letters
*whispers*
"Did he say C or D? or Z"?
Sometimes, it is hard to tell which letter the conductor announces during rehearsal. In my orchestra, this is magnified by a thick Russian accent, and terrible acoustics in the hall. The obvious solution would be for the conductor to use pronunciations designed to be unambiguous, like the phonetic alphabet used in military and aviation (alfa, bravo, charlie, ...). I wonder if any conductors actually do that? My first guess would be in the service bands. How about it?
"Did he say C or D? or Z"?
Sometimes, it is hard to tell which letter the conductor announces during rehearsal. In my orchestra, this is magnified by a thick Russian accent, and terrible acoustics in the hall. The obvious solution would be for the conductor to use pronunciations designed to be unambiguous, like the phonetic alphabet used in military and aviation (alfa, bravo, charlie, ...). I wonder if any conductors actually do that? My first guess would be in the service bands. How about it?
- tbdana
- Posts: 664
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2023 5:47 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
I like to make it even more confusing:
Start at "P," as in pneumonia.
Start at "H," as in honest.
Start at "G," as in gnarly.
Start at "K," as in kneel.
Start at "W," as in wrack.
And then just as you're in the middle of the count-off, someone invariably asks, "Where are we starting?"
Start at "P," as in pneumonia.
Start at "H," as in honest.
Start at "G," as in gnarly.
Start at "K," as in kneel.
Start at "W," as in wrack.
And then just as you're in the middle of the count-off, someone invariably asks, "Where are we starting?"
- BGuttman
- Posts: 6295
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:19 am
- Location: Cow Hampshire
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Even worse are the arbitrary numbering systems with (for example) every 5th bar numbered, and you want to start at the beginning of a phrase, so "Let's start at 3 after 35". Does that mean 38? 2 before 40?
Bruce Guttman
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
- LeTromboniste
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:22 am
- Location: Sion, CH
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Many conductors do that, not necessarily with the official phonetic alphabets but just with random words.AtomicClock wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 3:48 pm *whispers*
"Did he say C or D? or Z"?
Sometimes, it is hard to tell which letter the conductor announces during rehearsal. In my orchestra, this is magnified by a thick Russian accent, and terrible acoustics in the hall. The obvious solution would be for the conductor to use pronunciations designed to be unambiguous, like the phonetic alphabet used in military and aviation (alfa, bravo, charlie, ...). I wonder if any conductors actually do that? My first guess would be in the service bands. How about it?
Perhaps more confusing than not-quite-audible letters are measure numbers in German, when half the orchestra doesn't speak German as their first language. Call "fünfundsechzig" and you're bound to have at least a few musicians start at 56 instead of 65....and then if they're speaking in a local dialect where certain syllables in numbers sound very different, good luck... "fenfensachzig" sounds awfully close to "fenfenachtzig", combine that with the first problem and you might have people starting correctly at 65 but also at 56, 85 and 58!
Maximilien Brisson
www.maximilienbrisson.com
Lecturer for baroque trombone,
Hfk Bremen/University of the Arts Bremen
www.maximilienbrisson.com
Lecturer for baroque trombone,
Hfk Bremen/University of the Arts Bremen
- sirisobhakya
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 8:04 pm
- Location: Bangkok, Thailand
- Contact:
Re: Rehearsal Letters
I HATE sheet musics that use this system.
For letters, I now use NATO phonetic alphabet. Alpha-Bravo-Charlie-Delta, something like that.
Chaichan Wiriyaswat
Bangkok, Thailand
Bangkok, Thailand
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2021 5:07 pm
- Location: Gadsden, AL
Re: Rehearsal Letters
D as in Django
E as in Eh
F as in Filipino
G as in Gnat
K as in knock
O as in possum
P as in phone
W as in "Why, I oughta......"
X as in xylophone
Z as in zzzzzzzzzzzz
E as in Eh
F as in Filipino
G as in Gnat
K as in knock
O as in possum
P as in phone
W as in "Why, I oughta......"
X as in xylophone
Z as in zzzzzzzzzzzz
"When in doubt, blow out" - MSgt M.A. Mayo, Marine Band
The contest entry form said "Void where prohibited", so I peed on the Captain's desk.
The contest entry form said "Void where prohibited", so I peed on the Captain's desk.
- vetsurginc
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2019 10:26 am
Re: Rehearsal Letters
sirisobhakya wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 7:36 amI HATE sheet musics that use this system.
For letters, I now use NATO phonetic alphabet. Alpha-Bravo-Charlie-Delta, something like that.
- SwissTbone
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 11:40 pm
- Contact:
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Oooh boy! That's a big one here in our bilingual region. Makes rehearsing sometimes so much more difficult!LeTromboniste wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 4:33 pmMany conductors do that, not necessarily with the official phonetic alphabets but just with random words.AtomicClock wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 3:48 pm *whispers*
"Did he say C or D? or Z"?
Sometimes, it is hard to tell which letter the conductor announces during rehearsal. In my orchestra, this is magnified by a thick Russian accent, and terrible acoustics in the hall. The obvious solution would be for the conductor to use pronunciations designed to be unambiguous, like the phonetic alphabet used in military and aviation (alfa, bravo, charlie, ...). I wonder if any conductors actually do that? My first guess would be in the service bands. How about it?
Perhaps more confusing than not-quite-audible letters are measure numbers in German, when half the orchestra doesn't speak German as their first language. Call "fünfundsechzig" and you're bound to have at least a few musicians start at 56 instead of 65....and then if they're speaking in a local dialect where certain syllables in numbers sound very different, good luck... "fenfensachzig" sounds awfully close to "fenfenachtzig", combine that with the first problem and you might have people starting correctly at 65 but also at 56, 85 and 58!
ƒƒ---------------------------------------------------ƒƒ
Like trombones? Head over to https://swisstbone.com/ to see some great vintage and custom horns!
Like trombones? Head over to https://swisstbone.com/ to see some great vintage and custom horns!
- BGuttman
- Posts: 6295
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:19 am
- Location: Cow Hampshire
Re: Rehearsal Letters
In bi-lingual Switzerland you actually have three languages: French, German, and English for us lazy Americans.
And in other parts of Switzerland you have to speak Italian and that odd Romanche (I hope I spelled it correctly).
And in other parts of Switzerland you have to speak Italian and that odd Romanche (I hope I spelled it correctly).
Bruce Guttman
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
-
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 11:46 am
- Location: Vancouver WA
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Perhaps we should expand music as a universal language. Consider the following phonetic rehearsal letters in English, Italian, French, German, and Spanish:
A for ‘alf note, à tempo, à deux, Abstoßen, apoyattura
B for bagpipe, barcarolle, Baß (alternate: beklemmt) Beschleunigend, bajar
C for cowbell, cassa (alternate: castrato), C-moll, cascara (alternate: cajón)
You get the idea.
A for ‘alf note, à tempo, à deux, Abstoßen, apoyattura
B for bagpipe, barcarolle, Baß (alternate: beklemmt) Beschleunigend, bajar
C for cowbell, cassa (alternate: castrato), C-moll, cascara (alternate: cajón)
You get the idea.
Kenneth Biggs
I have known a great many troubles, but most of them have never happened.
—Mark Twain (attributed)
I have known a great many troubles, but most of them have never happened.
—Mark Twain (attributed)
- BGuttman
- Posts: 6295
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:19 am
- Location: Cow Hampshire
Re: Rehearsal Letters
So mC means "more cowbell"?
Bruce Guttman
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:31 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Don't use letters for navigating the notes - only bar numbers!
Lettering is made for confusion and can be arbitrary enough to consume serious time from rehearsals. I learned from a note engraver only to use numbering, bar 1 to bar x, and nothing else!
For commercial use, I'd also recommend to strictly avoid da capos and dal segnos, to facilitate what little rehearsal time there usually is - if any.
Lettering is made for confusion and can be arbitrary enough to consume serious time from rehearsals. I learned from a note engraver only to use numbering, bar 1 to bar x, and nothing else!
For commercial use, I'd also recommend to strictly avoid da capos and dal segnos, to facilitate what little rehearsal time there usually is - if any.
Welcome to visit my web store: https://www.danieleng.com/
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:01 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Rehearsal Letters
I hate bar numbers. The conductor invariably calls a number in the middle of a multibar rest, and I have to do arithmentic to find the location. Too prone to off-by-one errors. I also don't enjoy hand-numbering a part. Do you? "Let's start at 3 after 35" is unambiguous, even if not quite logical.
-
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:32 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Opposite here.Digidog wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 10:46 am Don't use letters for navigating the notes - only bar numbers!
Lettering is made for confusion and can be arbitrary enough to consume serious time from rehearsals. I learned from a note engraver only to use numbering, bar 1 to bar x, and nothing else!
For commercial use, I'd also recommend to strictly avoid da capos and dal segnos, to facilitate what little rehearsal time there usually is - if any.
-
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:07 pm
- Contact:
Re: Rehearsal Letters
I am annoyed by conductors who don't do their homework and show up to the first rehearsal with a score that's a different edition than the parts and numbered differently. And sadly, this happens a lot. I remember a particular rehearsal where the conductor called out a bar number to start at, and immediately the oboe player shouted, "We don't have bar numbers, only rehearsal letters." The crazy thing is, he proceeded to do the same thing several more times during rehearsal, and every time someone had to shout, "WE DON'T HAVE MEASURE NUMBERS!"
Brad Close Brass Instruments - brassmedic.com
- WilliamLang
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:12 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
G as in doG
M as in Mancy
Just hours of fun!
M as in Mancy
Just hours of fun!
William Lang
Interim Instructor, the University of Oklahoma
Faculty, Manhattan School of Music
Faculty, the Longy School of Music
Artist, Long Island Brass and Stephens Horns
founding member of loadbang
www.williamlang.org
Interim Instructor, the University of Oklahoma
Faculty, Manhattan School of Music
Faculty, the Longy School of Music
Artist, Long Island Brass and Stephens Horns
founding member of loadbang
www.williamlang.org
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:31 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
This you better explain to me.WGWTR180 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 7:22 pmOpposite here.Digidog wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 10:46 am Don't use letters for navigating the notes - only bar numbers!
Lettering is made for confusion and can be arbitrary enough to consume serious time from rehearsals. I learned from a note engraver only to use numbering, bar 1 to bar x, and nothing else!
For commercial use, I'd also recommend to strictly avoid da capos and dal segnos, to facilitate what little rehearsal time there usually is - if any.
"Finale" - or any notation program, for that matter - is the key word for numbering scores and parts. I learned the hard way to always put measure numbers at the left margin of each system, so every row indicates a measure number regardless of if in a rest or not.AtomicClock wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:48 pm I hate bar numbers. The conductor invariably calls a number in the middle of a multibar rest, and I have to do arithmentic to find the location. Too prone to off-by-one errors. I also don't enjoy hand-numbering a part. Do you? "Let's start at 3 after 35" is unambiguous, even if not quite logical.
Also: To say "let's start five bars before 'T', as in 'Thatcher'!" should be equally arithmetic if that is in the middle of a sixteen bar rest, or am I missing something in your reasoning?
Welcome to visit my web store: https://www.danieleng.com/
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
- LeTromboniste
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:22 am
- Location: Sion, CH
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Rehearsal marks break multirests. "5 before T" is always going to be easy to count. Arguably, it also forces conductors starting somewhere logical that will be easy for everyone to find, assuming the rehearsal marks are well placed and frequent enough. No good conductor will say "53 before T" because it's quicker and safer to just play from the previous rehearsal mark than for everyone to count correctly. If the rehearsal marks are too spread out, then that's a problem of there not being enough of them, not a problem inherent to rehearsal marks.Digidog wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:25 amThis you better explain to me.
"Finale" - or any notation program, for that matter - is the key word for numbering scores and parts. I learned the hard way to always put measure numbers at the left margin of each system, so every row indicates a measure number regardless of if in a rest or not.AtomicClock wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:48 pm I hate bar numbers. The conductor invariably calls a number in the middle of a multibar rest, and I have to do arithmentic to find the location. Too prone to off-by-one errors. I also don't enjoy hand-numbering a part. Do you? "Let's start at 3 after 35" is unambiguous, even if not quite logical.
Also: To say "let's start five bars before 'T', as in 'Thatcher'!" should be equally arithmetic if that is in the middle of a sixteen bar rest, or am I missing something in your reasoning?
"Start at 235" when that falls in the middle of a 73-bar multi rest can be a real annoyance, especially if there's a cue between the multi rest and your next entrance. You then need to do some quick math (and possibly mess it up) which might require a different counting method depending on where in the system things fall and what is the most convenient starting point to count (forwards or backwards) from. Or you need to mark in advance the bar numbers of every entrance (which, arguable, shouldn't be your job).
For shorter pieces or works where nobody has long rests, I use bar numbers and no rehearsal marks in my editions, because in that context it's easiest to just call bar numbers. For longer pieces or with large ensembles where some instruments may have long rests, I use rehearsal marks.
Maximilien Brisson
www.maximilienbrisson.com
Lecturer for baroque trombone,
Hfk Bremen/University of the Arts Bremen
www.maximilienbrisson.com
Lecturer for baroque trombone,
Hfk Bremen/University of the Arts Bremen
-
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:32 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Digidog wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:25 amThis you better explain to me.
Well it really depends on the piece of music. In some orchestra works with major rest areas it's sometimes difficult to catch "measure 225 within 59 bars of rest." Stating "before rehearsal letter C count back twelve bars" is easier if stated that way. If one says "start 12 bars before letter C" it takes longer. I learned this technique in conducting class in grad school. Works for most. Other pieces of music, depending on how they're written out, are more number friendly. But we're all wired differently. If you're a number guy and need the numbers okay.
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:31 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
As rehearsal bars break multimeasure rests, the main problem with most classical - or poorly engraved or edited in general - repertoire is that there are too few of them, and too far between. I mean; Fauré's Requiem for trombone - come on!LeTromboniste wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 4:19 am Rehearsal marks break multirests. "5 before T" is always going to be easy to count. Arguably, it also forces conductors starting somewhere logical that will be easy for everyone to find, assuming the rehearsal marks are well placed and frequent enough. No good conductor will say "53 before T" because it's quicker and safer to just play from the previous rehearsal mark than for everyone to count correctly. If the rehearsal marks are too spread out, then that's a problem of there not being enough of them, not a problem inherent to rehearsal marks.
"Start at 235" when that falls in the middle of a 73-bar multi rest can be a real annoyance, especially if there's a cue between the multi rest and your next entrance. You then need to do some quick math (and possibly mess it up) which might require a different counting method depending on where in the system things fall and what is the most convenient starting point to count (forwards or backwards) from. Or you need to mark in advance the bar numbers of every entrance (which, arguable, shouldn't be your job).
For shorter pieces or works where nobody has long rests, I use bar numbers and no rehearsal marks in my editions, because in that context it's easiest to just call bar numbers. For longer pieces or with large ensembles where some instruments may have long rests, I use rehearsal marks.
For commercial use, I try to never have more than 12 bars between marks and no fewer than 4 (and that is rare), and I try to keep those marks as close to phrases or sections of the music as possible; all to provide logical starting and rehearsing points to facilitate the overall work to with the least rehearsing time possible make the music work. For that I have also found that numbering the bars and marks always is better than lettering them.
Even a heavy accent can make "five-eight" or "fifty eight" discernible in an ensemble expecting numbers from being provided numbered music, while f.ex. a French conductor I once had had huge problems in saying an understandable "H". Many non English speaking also confuse A and I, as a further example.
Welcome to visit my web store: https://www.danieleng.com/
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
-
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:32 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
This post didn't start out as a "what would you do" post. It was asking a different question.Digidog wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 6:51 amAs rehearsal bars break multimeasure rests, the main problem with most classical - or poorly engraved or edited in general - repertoire is that there are too few of them, and too far between. I mean; Fauré's Requiem for trombone - come on!LeTromboniste wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 4:19 am Rehearsal marks break multirests. "5 before T" is always going to be easy to count. Arguably, it also forces conductors starting somewhere logical that will be easy for everyone to find, assuming the rehearsal marks are well placed and frequent enough. No good conductor will say "53 before T" because it's quicker and safer to just play from the previous rehearsal mark than for everyone to count correctly. If the rehearsal marks are too spread out, then that's a problem of there not being enough of them, not a problem inherent to rehearsal marks.
"Start at 235" when that falls in the middle of a 73-bar multi rest can be a real annoyance, especially if there's a cue between the multi rest and your next entrance. You then need to do some quick math (and possibly mess it up) which might require a different counting method depending on where in the system things fall and what is the most convenient starting point to count (forwards or backwards) from. Or you need to mark in advance the bar numbers of every entrance (which, arguable, shouldn't be your job).
For shorter pieces or works where nobody has long rests, I use bar numbers and no rehearsal marks in my editions, because in that context it's easiest to just call bar numbers. For longer pieces or with large ensembles where some instruments may have long rests, I use rehearsal marks.
For commercial use, I try to never have more than 12 bars between marks and no fewer than 4 (and that is rare), and I try to keep those marks as close to phrases or sections of the music as possible; all to provide logical starting and rehearsing points to facilitate the overall work to with the least rehearsing time possible make the music work. For that I have also found that numbering the bars and marks always is better than lettering them.
Even a heavy accent can make "five-eight" or "fifty eight" discernible in an ensemble expecting numbers from being provided numbered music, while f.ex. a French conductor I once had had huge problems in saying an understandable "H". Many non English speaking also confuse A and I, as a further example.
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:01 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Rehearsal Letters
I don't count to 16 starting with 12. I just count to 5.
Last edited by AtomicClock on Wed Mar 20, 2024 7:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:01 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Rehearsal Letters
One of the nice things about the NATO phonetic alphabet is that you don't have to say "T as in Tango", you just say Tango. It's a longer, clearer alternative pronunciation of the letter, not an example word that just starts with the letter.
- BGuttman
- Posts: 6295
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:19 am
- Location: Cow Hampshire
Re: Rehearsal Letters
If you are used to using the NATO phonetics (or the US Military phonetics, which are slightly different) that's great. Not too many conductors are taught that alphabet.
If you have a few players who are not native English speakers sometimes the phonetics won't work that way.
I still have problems with parts with a big blank place that is marked "tacet jusq'au" then a few marked rest bars, maybe a cue, maybe a letter, and then notes to play. I can count long rests (I actually played bass trombone on Beethoven's 9th -- 561 bars out in a fast 1, followed by a D above the staff SOLO) but guessing what's in a big blank area is a real pain.
If you have a few players who are not native English speakers sometimes the phonetics won't work that way.
I still have problems with parts with a big blank place that is marked "tacet jusq'au" then a few marked rest bars, maybe a cue, maybe a letter, and then notes to play. I can count long rests (I actually played bass trombone on Beethoven's 9th -- 561 bars out in a fast 1, followed by a D above the staff SOLO) but guessing what's in a big blank area is a real pain.
Bruce Guttman
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
-
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:32 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Well that's interesting and I don't disagree. There was a conductor around here who would use names of cities for the letters. It worked and became fun to see what he'd come up with.AtomicClock wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 7:47 amOne of the nice things about the NATO phonetic alphabet is that you don't have to say "T as in Tango", you just say Tango. It's a longer, clearer alternative pronunciation of the letter, not an example word that just starts with the letter.
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:01 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Hence, my question about service bands.
The NATO alphabet was designed to be understandable to speakers of multiple (mostly western european) languages.
Bolero does this.
-
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:20 am
- Location: Boston, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Rehearsal Letters
My casual observation is that this rehearsal numbering system - usually every 10 measures - seems to come exclusively from music created in countries with totalitarian governments.
Gabe Rice
Faculty
Boston University School of Music
Kinhaven Music School Senior Session
Bass Trombonist
Hartford Symphony Orchestra
Rhode Island Philharmonic Orchestra
Vermont Symphony Orchestra
Faculty
Boston University School of Music
Kinhaven Music School Senior Session
Bass Trombonist
Hartford Symphony Orchestra
Rhode Island Philharmonic Orchestra
Vermont Symphony Orchestra
-
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 11:46 am
- Location: Vancouver WA
Re: Rehearsal Letters
LeTromboniste » Wed Mar 20, 2024 3:19 am
Why shouldn’t the musician number their parts? In a professional group with a dedicated (and hopefully, decently paid) librarian, some of that responsibility would fall to them. But community groups I’ve played in ask the musicians to number their parts.
I usually put measure numbers in the left margin, along with rehearsal letters, cues, and multi-measure rests. If there’s an important cue in the middle of an eighty-bar rest, I’ll mark underneath “59 + 21,” and then an abbreviation for the instrument. I’d rather have a mark that I don’t use than not have a mark that I need.
This is a chronic problem for instruments that don’t play as often. I have enough problems counting rests, but trying to add or subtract x from y while listening to the conductor’s instructions, holding the horn, trying to ignore the useless chatter of the other 50-70 voices, is sometimes too much sensory input for me."Start at 235" when that falls in the middle of a 73-bar multi rest can be a real annoyance, especially if there's a cue between the multi rest and your next entrance. You then need to do some quick math (and possibly mess it up) which might require a different counting method depending on where in the system things fall and what is the most convenient starting point to count (forwards or backwards) from. Or you need to mark in advance the bar numbers of every entrance (which, arguable, shouldn't be your job).
Why shouldn’t the musician number their parts? In a professional group with a dedicated (and hopefully, decently paid) librarian, some of that responsibility would fall to them. But community groups I’ve played in ask the musicians to number their parts.
I usually put measure numbers in the left margin, along with rehearsal letters, cues, and multi-measure rests. If there’s an important cue in the middle of an eighty-bar rest, I’ll mark underneath “59 + 21,” and then an abbreviation for the instrument. I’d rather have a mark that I don’t use than not have a mark that I need.
Kenneth Biggs
I have known a great many troubles, but most of them have never happened.
—Mark Twain (attributed)
I have known a great many troubles, but most of them have never happened.
—Mark Twain (attributed)
-
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 11:46 am
- Location: Vancouver WA
Re: Rehearsal Letters
If I hadn’t just played David Maslanka’s “Fanfare for Mother Earth,” I would agree. (My section mates who have more experience with concert and wind bands assured it’s the norm for Maslanka. ) I first started seeing this style in chamber music that was written in the 1950’s-1980’s or so. I think there are different conventions for numbering that depend on the composer, the school of composition they hail from, the publisher, the country, etc.GabrielRice wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 10:34 amMy casual observation is that this rehearsal numbering system - usually every 10 measures - seems to come exclusively from music created in countries with totalitarian governments.
Kenneth Biggs
I have known a great many troubles, but most of them have never happened.
—Mark Twain (attributed)
I have known a great many troubles, but most of them have never happened.
—Mark Twain (attributed)
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 5165
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:18 pm
- Location: Fort Riley, Kansas
- Contact:
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Chester is one that has rehearsal numbers that make zero sense.
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:31 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Yes, but I am baffled that now, when notation software never have been better, and the layout possibilities for both scores and parts are fantastic, people still use old engravings, from the nineteenth century, with pedagogically terrible layouts and dispositions, while also lettering rehearsal marks.WGWTR180 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 6:55 amThis post didn't start out as a "what would you do" post. It was asking a different question.Digidog wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 6:51 am
As rehearsal bars break multimeasure rests, the main problem with most classical - or poorly engraved or edited in general - repertoire is that there are too few of them, and too far between. I mean; Fauré's Requiem for trombone - come on!
For commercial use, I try to never have more than 12 bars between marks and no fewer than 4 (and that is rare), and I try to keep those marks as close to phrases or sections of the music as possible; all to provide logical starting and rehearsing points to facilitate the overall work to with the least rehearsing time possible make the music work. For that I have also found that numbering the bars and marks always is better than lettering them.
Even a heavy accent can make "five-eight" or "fifty eight" discernible in an ensemble expecting numbers from being provided numbered music, while f.ex. a French conductor I once had had huge problems in saying an understandable "H". Many non English speaking also confuse A and I, as a further example.
How hard would it be to make proper new editions of old scores, to break down those 250-bar rests into more manageable and followable sections, and to provide good and comprehensible rehearsal marking?
Welcome to visit my web store: https://www.danieleng.com/
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
- LeTromboniste
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:22 am
- Location: Sion, CH
Re: Rehearsal Letters
I'm happy to make a new edition of an old score for you or your conductor. As a professional editor, my going rate is $0.35 per frame (that's any bar that has music in it, any bar that has lyrics in it and any bar that has dynamics or other staff text in it, for each staff or text line, not counting copy-pasted material), and then $35/hour for cleaning up and optimizing the layout of the score and parts (because no, just inputting the notes in Finale doesn't give you an acceptable result without more editing work).
A Romantic 45-60 minute symphony is going to set you back several thousand dollars. For an opera, expect a 5-figure amount.
Maximilien Brisson
www.maximilienbrisson.com
Lecturer for baroque trombone,
Hfk Bremen/University of the Arts Bremen
www.maximilienbrisson.com
Lecturer for baroque trombone,
Hfk Bremen/University of the Arts Bremen
-
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:32 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
So once again, staying in the orchestral field, why would anybody want to spend the money and the time to redo editions that have been used for decades? Orchestras these days if you have not noticed our actually trying to find new sources of revenue. Of course, it would not necessarily be up to the orchestra, depending on what level of orchestra we are speaking of. But I cannot imagine the Boston Symphony trashing all of the music that they own and then having a publishing company do new additions for them. In all honesty, it’s just not that difficult to use most of these parts.Digidog wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 11:37 amYes, but I am baffled that now, when notation software never have been better, and the layout possibilities for both scores and parts are fantastic, people still use old engravings, from the nineteenth century, with pedagogically terrible layouts and dispositions, while also lettering rehearsal marks.
How hard would it be to make proper new editions of old scores, to break down those 250-bar rests into more manageable and followable sections, and to provide good and comprehensible rehearsal marking?
If you do it enough, you know.
-
- Posts: 666
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:44 am
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Wichita Symphony Orchestra owns a few staples. On any given concert, the majority of the performance is rented. Score rentals is a big business. Transcription inevitably introduces new errors for performers to discover. Only native English speakers would necessarily be expected to know the English alphabet. The percentage who do not increases each year. The trend towards arbitrary numbers in even fives or tens is by transcribers who fancy themselves as mathematicians. Good luck with that. This crowd won’t be happy until each performer has their own computer tablet that turns the page for them and gives a 5 measure blinking light countdown personalized cue.
Doug Elliot would be subject matter expert. Service bands and orchestras use the same repertoire as anyone else, except for what they create. Their budgets are even tighter.
Doug Elliot would be subject matter expert. Service bands and orchestras use the same repertoire as anyone else, except for what they create. Their budgets are even tighter.
Richard Smith
Wichita, Kansas
Wichita, Kansas
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:31 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
But the rehearsal points should be numbered by the actual bar number, not some randomly chosen number, or numbered by some warped logic that noone can follow.harrisonreed wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 11:18 am Chester is one that has rehearsal numbers that make zero sense.
If a starting point suitable to rehearse from is in bar 59, then that point should be labelled "59" and every staff system should have the actual bar number above it in the left margin.
Last edited by Digidog on Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
Welcome to visit my web store: https://www.danieleng.com/
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 5165
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:18 pm
- Location: Fort Riley, Kansas
- Contact:
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Chester has a rehearsal measure marked every 5 bars. Nothing to do with the phrases. It's pretty bad.Digidog wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:06 amBut the rehearsal points should be numbered by the actual bar number, not some randomly chosen number, numbers by some warped logic that noone can follow.harrisonreed wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 11:18 am Chester is one that has rehearsal numbers that make zero sense.
If a staring point suitable to rehearse from is in bar 59, then that point should be labelled "59" and every staff system should have the actual bar number above it in the left margin.
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:01 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Rehearsal Letters
I prefer rehearsal points when they are letters, not numbers. It is less ambiguous. Oftentimes, the conductor calls a starting position some number of measures before or after the rehearsal point. Before is fine; the ambiguous case is after. This is because rehearsal letters are clearly BETWEEN the two measures, and rehearsal numbers (measure number style) are either between the two measures, or the number of the measure it begins.
Take for example, "Start three after 65". You dutifully count one (65), two (66), three (67), and everyone plays measure 67. Even though 65+3 is 68. Consider the degenerate case of "one after 65". That is the same as measure 65. Nonsense. This is because we count measures after the rehearsal point 65, which precedes measure 65, in the gap between 64 and 65. But we're all used to it, and don't think about it much. Except when large blocks of rests force us to switch from habit to arithmetic, and invite the off-by-one error.
Take for example, "Start three after 65". You dutifully count one (65), two (66), three (67), and everyone plays measure 67. Even though 65+3 is 68. Consider the degenerate case of "one after 65". That is the same as measure 65. Nonsense. This is because we count measures after the rehearsal point 65, which precedes measure 65, in the gap between 64 and 65. But we're all used to it, and don't think about it much. Except when large blocks of rests force us to switch from habit to arithmetic, and invite the off-by-one error.
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:31 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Yeah, and I loathe poorly marked up notes. It can really bog a whole rehearsal.harrisonreed wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:07 amChester has a rehearsal measure marked every 5 bars. Nothing to do with the phrases. It's pretty bad.Digidog wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:06 am
But the rehearsal points should be numbered by the actual bar number, not some randomly chosen number, numbers by some warped logic that noone can follow.
If a staring point suitable to rehearse from is in bar 59, then that point should be labelled "59" and every staff system should have the actual bar number above it in the left margin.
There once was a fantastic arranger here in Sweden, who consistently marked his music differently from part to part. The clarinets could have bar numbers and a first and second house, while the trombones could have letterings and a da capo, when the trumpets had both numbers and letterings and no repeat whatsoever. His arrangements were great and truly innovative, but the music ended up nearly impossible to rehearse because of his inconsistencies. Accordingly nobody plays his works today, and his arranging and composing never really took off so that he is more or less in oblivion today, some thirty years after his passing. I have heard rumours that he was a periodical alcoholic, so if that's true it could explain some, but his music is a true pain to sight read and rehearse nonetheless.
Welcome to visit my web store: https://www.danieleng.com/
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:31 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
When I lead bands or orchestras, I always say exactly what measure I want to start from - I never relate to a bar number. Like "everybody from bar 87!" or "start at rehearsal number 154" which in that case should be bar 154 if the engraver have done a proper work.AtomicClock wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:20 am I prefer rehearsal points when they are letters, not numbers. It is less ambiguous. Oftentimes, the conductor calls a starting position some number of measures before or after the rehearsal point. Before is fine; the ambiguous case is after. This is because rehearsal letters are clearly BETWEEN the two measures, and rehearsal numbers (measure number style) are either between the two measures, or the number of the measure it begins.
Take for example, "Start three after 65". You dutifully count one (65), two (66), three (67), and everyone plays measure 67. Even though 65+3 is 68. Consider the degenerate case of "one after 65". That is the same as measure 65. Nonsense. This is because we count measures after the rehearsal point 65, which precedes measure 65, in the gap between 64 and 65. But we're all used to it, and don't think about it much. Except when large blocks of rests force us to switch from habit to arithmetic, and invite the off-by-one error.
It's a figure of speech - and a matter of exactness from the conductor's side.
Welcome to visit my web store: https://www.danieleng.com/
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:01 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Rehearsal Letters
So you require the players to hand-number their parts before (which means during) rehearsal? Or only play charts published with numbers?
- BGuttman
- Posts: 6295
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:19 am
- Location: Cow Hampshire
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Numbering parts with measure numbers every 5 used to be a standard with one publisher. All the Aaron Copland stuff we played was numbered that way. I also think that the early Finale numbering system was this way as well.
I've encountered parts using numbers for rehearsal point but not actual measure numbers. So "5 after number 10" is not measure 15, but somewhere further into the piece. Can get very confusing.
I've encountered parts using numbers for rehearsal point but not actual measure numbers. So "5 after number 10" is not measure 15, but somewhere further into the piece. Can get very confusing.
Bruce Guttman
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 5165
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:18 pm
- Location: Fort Riley, Kansas
- Contact:
Re: Rehearsal Letters
It was, at least in Chester, the worst of both worlds because not only was, say, rehearsal measure 65 in the exact middle of a phrase at the worst place to start, but you then also ran into the issue of confusing people with the "2 after measure 60" thing described above. And it's in a kind of mixed meter feel if I recall, to compound it all.BGuttman wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 11:01 am Numbering parts with measure numbers every 5 used to be a standard with one publisher. All the Aaron Copland stuff we played was numbered that way. I also think that the early Finale numbering system was this way as well.
I've encountered parts using numbers for rehearsal point but not actual measure numbers. So "5 after number 10" is not measure 15, but somewhere further into the piece. Can get very confusing.
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:01 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Rehearsal Letters
In a stack of photocopied band parts I may or may not have on my shelf ( ):
Description | Count |
---|---|
No rehearsal points, no measure numbers | 11 |
No rehearsal points, every measure numbered | 1 |
Rehearsal letters | 20 |
Sequential rehearsal numbers (1,2,3,...) | 5 |
Big measure numbers used as rehearsal points, on sensible phrases | 27 |
Big measure numbers used as rehearsal points, every 5th measure | 1 |
Last edited by AtomicClock on Mon Mar 25, 2024 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:07 pm
- Contact:
Re: Rehearsal Letters
If you really want to throw everyone off, tell them to start at letter "I".
Brad Close Brass Instruments - brassmedic.com
-
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:07 pm
- Contact:
Re: Rehearsal Letters
The smart way to do it is to say, "Start in the third bar of 65". No ambiguity.AtomicClock wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:20 am I prefer rehearsal points when they are letters, not numbers. It is less ambiguous. Oftentimes, the conductor calls a starting position some number of measures before or after the rehearsal point. Before is fine; the ambiguous case is after. This is because rehearsal letters are clearly BETWEEN the two measures, and rehearsal numbers (measure number style) are either between the two measures, or the number of the measure it begins.
Take for example, "Start three after 65". You dutifully count one (65), two (66), three (67), and everyone plays measure 67. Even though 65+3 is 68. Consider the degenerate case of "one after 65". That is the same as measure 65. Nonsense. This is because we count measures after the rehearsal point 65, which precedes measure 65, in the gap between 64 and 65. But we're all used to it, and don't think about it much. Except when large blocks of rests force us to switch from habit to arithmetic, and invite the off-by-one error.
Brad Close Brass Instruments - brassmedic.com
- LeTromboniste
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:22 am
- Location: Sion, CH
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Then you should be prepared for those whose bar 87 is the 23rd bar of a 41-bar multirest not to come in at their next entrance or come in wrong.Digidog wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:25 amWhen I lead bands or orchestras, I always say exactly what measure I want to start from - I never relate to a bar number. Like "everybody from bar 87!" or "start at rehearsal number 154" which in that case should be bar 154 if the engraver have done a proper work.AtomicClock wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:20 am I prefer rehearsal points when they are letters, not numbers. It is less ambiguous. Oftentimes, the conductor calls a starting position some number of measures before or after the rehearsal point. Before is fine; the ambiguous case is after. This is because rehearsal letters are clearly BETWEEN the two measures, and rehearsal numbers (measure number style) are either between the two measures, or the number of the measure it begins.
Take for example, "Start three after 65". You dutifully count one (65), two (66), three (67), and everyone plays measure 67. Even though 65+3 is 68. Consider the degenerate case of "one after 65". That is the same as measure 65. Nonsense. This is because we count measures after the rehearsal point 65, which precedes measure 65, in the gap between 64 and 65. But we're all used to it, and don't think about it much. Except when large blocks of rests force us to switch from habit to arithmetic, and invite the off-by-one error.
It's a figure of speech - and a matter of exactness from the conductor's side.
Maximilien Brisson
www.maximilienbrisson.com
Lecturer for baroque trombone,
Hfk Bremen/University of the Arts Bremen
www.maximilienbrisson.com
Lecturer for baroque trombone,
Hfk Bremen/University of the Arts Bremen
- bitbckt
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2020 11:41 am
- Location: Maine
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Rehearsal markers should be engraved as dingbats, obviously.
“Take it from the heavy open center cross…”
“Take it from the heavy open center cross…”
- JohnL
- Posts: 1854
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:01 am
- Contact:
Re: Rehearsal Letters
Probably mostly older editions of traditional marches in landscape format. The usual rehearsal points were just kind of "understood", like "1st Strain", "Break Strain", or (my favorite) "Dogfight".AtomicClock wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 2:22 pm In a stack of photocopied band parts I may or may not have on my shelf ( ):
No rehearsal points, no measure numbers 11
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2021 5:07 pm
- Location: Gadsden, AL
Re: Rehearsal Letters
According to my Jarhead musician father (see signature), break up sections are called "lightening strikes the shit house strain".Probably mostly older editions of traditional marches in landscape format. The usual rehearsal points were just kind of "understood", like "1st Strain", "Break Strain", or (my favorite) "Dogfight".
"When in doubt, blow out" - MSgt M.A. Mayo, Marine Band
The contest entry form said "Void where prohibited", so I peed on the Captain's desk.
The contest entry form said "Void where prohibited", so I peed on the Captain's desk.
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:31 pm
Re: Rehearsal Letters
No, I am just tired of, and pi$$ed by, even professional orchestras handing out hundred year old editions of major works, with atrocious notation and markings (you wouldn't believe how bad the trombone parts for Tannhäuser looked like, that we got a few weeks ago).AtomicClock wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:28 am So you require the players to hand-number their parts before (which means during) rehearsal? Or only play charts published with numbers?
This discussion of rehearsing marks, says something of the financial conditions for music and orchestral playing. I mean; you would never see a law firm using a misspelt law book with arbitrary side numbering and long blanks in sections that were not concerning their judicial specialisation.
As Maximilien said: To produce fresh editions of major scores would take thousands of $, so it seems like we have to wait for some institution to strike a jackpot and investing it in their sheet music, or to put up with poorly marked-up rehearsing points and ambiguous notation.
Welcome to visit my web store: https://www.danieleng.com/
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A
Big Engband on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/30Vuft1 ... me3sZi8q-A