Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
-
Trombola2112
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2022 4:55 pm
Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
As I have been playing bass more and more I find my Schilke 58 to be a tad on the small side. I have a Schilke 59 I've been experimenting with that's currently seems a bit on the large side (still need to put more time on it). Depending on how the 59 works out I might look to something more in-between, maybe a 110 in DE terms. Just curious if anyone has had experience with mouthpieces around that size, DE or otherwise.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
There are so, so, so many better pieces in the size range of the 59. I'd try some of those first.
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
-
Posaunus
- Posts: 4854
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
Since you mentioned it - why not try a Doug Elliott setup in your desired size range?
Certainly better for me than a Schilke 59 - or any Bach mouthpiece.
Certainly better for me than a Schilke 59 - or any Bach mouthpiece.
-
Trombola2112
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2022 4:55 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
Honestly that'll probably be the first thing I'll do once I get a better idea of what I do/don't like about the Schilke. Was curious about 110 sized rims. Most of the time when mentioned people seem to gravitate more to 108 or 112.Posaunus wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 9:48 pm Since you mentioned it - why not try a Doug Elliott setup in your desired size range?
Certainly better for me than a Schilke 59 - or any Bach mouthpiece.
- Doug Elliott
- Posts: 3989
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:12 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
Actually 110 is a pretty popular size. For some reason everybody skips over 111.
I just made LB J, K, and L cups. And one J+, which may become a new standard size when I can make more.
I just made LB J, K, and L cups. And one J+, which may become a new standard size when I can make more.
Lord of the Rims
-
mrdeacon
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2018 2:05 am
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
Elliott LB J setup is great for larger 1.5G. I played on a LB114, LB J cup and J8 shank for years.
I’m a big fan of the Greg Black 1.5G. IMO best 1.5G out there. Looks and sounds like a 1.5G but feels like a modern mouthpiece. If you want to go George Robert’s style the 1 7/16G is another good choice.
Finally don’t forget a Symington 1.5G! Amazing Mount Vernon style piece.
I’m a big fan of the Greg Black 1.5G. IMO best 1.5G out there. Looks and sounds like a 1.5G but feels like a modern mouthpiece. If you want to go George Robert’s style the 1 7/16G is another good choice.
Finally don’t forget a Symington 1.5G! Amazing Mount Vernon style piece.
Rath R1, Rath R3, Rath R4, Rath R9, Minick Bass Trombone
- hyperbolica
- Posts: 3880
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:31 am
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
Depending on how you like your sound the Curry 2.oD and 1.5D are in that range, and are very conical. They brighten up the sound but play like a deeper cup. Stork are similar and Ferguson V and L kind of fit into that range too. (feel smaller sound bigger)
Ive also got the DE MB, LB, XB in the J and K cups with 110/112/114 rims. The DE stuff is really good. It's fun topoke around and zero in on the best combo with his stuff. I've been trying to move to the smaller sizes, like 110 J, even though the 112 K gives a better sound. The K leaves my chops feeling more tired.
I just got a Duo Gravis, which will probably work better with the smaller pieces.
Ive also got the DE MB, LB, XB in the J and K cups with 110/112/114 rims. The DE stuff is really good. It's fun topoke around and zero in on the best combo with his stuff. I've been trying to move to the smaller sizes, like 110 J, even though the 112 K gives a better sound. The K leaves my chops feeling more tired.
I just got a Duo Gravis, which will probably work better with the smaller pieces.
Last edited by hyperbolica on Thu Oct 23, 2025 2:44 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- ghmerrill
- Posts: 1836
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 4:41 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
... and extremely educational -- from both the perspective of learning about how different combinations of rim/bowl/shank work and learning about what works best for YOU.hyperbolica wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 11:49 pm It's fun to poke around and zero in on the best combo with his stuff.
From my perspective, a critical factor is how the mouthpiece fits the mouth I have. I like how my mouthpiece sounds with the 110 overall, but it's just a bit small and "constraining" for me, and inhibits freedom in the double valve range. We all have different faces. Maybe someday I'll try a 111, but the 112 seems to be killing it at this point. I've experimented heavily with 110, 112, and 114 rims, and 8, 9, and 10 shanks. So I know where the limits are.I've been trying to move to the smaller sizes, like 108 J, even though the 110 K gives a better sound. The K leaves my chops feeling more tired.
I got a Markey 85 mostly to see what it was like, and it's a really good mouthpiece, but my DE set-up is just better for me, especially in the low range. I've kept the Markey as a "backup", but the DE is just better for me. Maybe the Markey 87 would have been a better trial, but feared it was more likely to be a bit "too big". I'll never know since I don't see any point in continuing that experimentation.
Gary Merrill
Getzen 1052FD
DE LB K/K9/110 Lexan
---------------------------
Amati Oval Euph
1924 Buescher 3-valve Eb tuba
1947 Olds "Standard" trombone (Bach 12c)
Getzen 1052FD
DE LB K/K9/110 Lexan
---------------------------
Amati Oval Euph
1924 Buescher 3-valve Eb tuba
1947 Olds "Standard" trombone (Bach 12c)
-
Trombola2112
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2022 4:55 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
What % of people would you say chooses MB vs LB for the 110 rims (since the rim size overlaps)?Doug Elliott wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 11:09 pm Actually 110 is a pretty popular size. For some reason everybody skips over 111.
- Doug Elliott
- Posts: 3989
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:12 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
MB 110 tends to restrict the low range, LB 110 opens it up. Different cup volume, and what GR called the "alpha angle," his made-up name for how the rim inner edge goes down to the cup.
The MB series is great for 107, 108, and 109 rim sizes, the "1-1/2G and slightly larger" feel.
The MB series is great for 107, 108, and 109 rim sizes, the "1-1/2G and slightly larger" feel.
Lord of the Rims
-
Trombola2112
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2022 4:55 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
For the 110, would the LB series be better for a "smaller 1.25)?Doug Elliott wrote: Thu Oct 23, 2025 5:31 pm The MB series is great for 107, 108, and 109 rim sizes, the "1-1/2G and slightly larger" feel.
- Doug Elliott
- Posts: 3989
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:12 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
Yes, exactly. And it would have the openness to produce easier low range.
Lord of the Rims
- Savio
- Posts: 708
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 5:23 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
I like the MB rim. More flat than the LB I think? But thats me. Many good mouthpieces mentioned above. Except the Schilke 59 didn't work for me, I got too diffuse sound. 58 works ok for me. I'm little curious about the Markey 85? Rim size is 1 1/4? and shape? How does it feel?
Leif
Leif
-
bassboy
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2019 1:38 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
+1 for the Curry mouthpieces! I use a Curry 2D for 90% of everything, and for that other "high" playing, had Doug Elliott thread my Curry 1.5G for MB rims, on which I have a MB108. Don't sleep on these!hyperbolica wrote: Wed Oct 22, 2025 11:49 pm Depending on how you like your sound the Curry 2.oD and 1.5D are in that range, and are very conical. They brighten up the sound but play like a deeper cup.
- hyperbolica
- Posts: 3880
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:31 am
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
You know I was thinking of doing just that with the Curry 1.5D. How does that 108 fit? I'd probably also get a Curry 2.0D done. I'm kind of addicted to Doug's lexan rims.bassboy wrote: Fri Oct 24, 2025 8:36 am +1 for the Curry mouthpieces! I use a Curry 2D for 90% of everything, and for that other "high" playing, had Doug Elliott thread my Curry 1.5G for MB rims, on which I have a MB108. Don't sleep on these!
-
MTbassbone
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:08 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
I really enjoy using a wider diameter rim on a smaller size cup. For me it's DE LB 113 J, J8. Also the lexan rims are so comfortable.
-
bassboy
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2019 1:38 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
It fits pretty good! Not 150,000% flush with the cup, but close enough for comfort. I just got through using it for my Oktoberfest gigs (2-4 hours each) and had no issues. Doug's work is great, as always.hyperbolica wrote: Fri Oct 24, 2025 2:59 pmYou know I was thinking of doing just that with the Curry 1.5D. How does that 108 fit? I'd probably also get a Curry 2.0D done. I'm kind of addicted to Doug's lexan rims.bassboy wrote: Fri Oct 24, 2025 8:36 am +1 for the Curry mouthpieces! I use a Curry 2D for 90% of everything, and for that other "high" playing, had Doug Elliott thread my Curry 1.5G for MB rims, on which I have a MB108. Don't sleep on these!
-
RustBeltBass
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 4:56 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
Maybe consider a GB 1 3/8 or 1 5/16 ?
-
MattR1
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2025 1:28 pm
Re: Big 1.5 vs Small 1.25
Another option would be a Griego 1.5. IMO this plays somewhere between a 1.5 and 1.25.