Nickel MK42 lead pipe on 88H thoughts
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2025 11:44 am
Nothing profound here, just interesting and wanted to share thoughts.
A little while ago I asked for advice here about a small crack in my 88H's lead pipe, which I had pulled/threaded. Consensus seemed to be that it was fine (it was once I got used to the negligible change in feel from the heavier, threaded receiver and added length), a great pipe, and not worth experimenting with.
Stubborn and curious, I picked up a nickel silver MK42 lead pipe (MK's take on an MV42) that was in stock...a completely different set up from the more open, shorter yellow brass Conn pipe. I had looked at Brass Ark's MV42, per recommendation from Noah, but it would have been a long wait time, and much more than I cared to pay for an experiment.
I've had this 88H in some form since 8th grade, and always got glowing compliments on my tone/sound concept with it. One observation I've had is that I consistently get lost or buried on principal parts. I think a lot of this is just my playing style, but with the 88H, projection and cutting through when needed just felt like an uphill, losing battle, particularly in the community orchestra I play in where the Bass Trombonist has a HUGE, wide, aggressive sound concept. I had the horn rebuilt last year with an Instrument Innovations valve, which improved the horn's resonance, lower register, centering, and overall playability significantly (albeit making the horn a bit heavier and more of an air hog), but left it's original character mostly alone.
My hope with the new lead pipe was that the nickel would add a little more cutting brilliance and crisper articulations, and that the Bach style pipe might add a little more welcomed resistance (to counter the open valve) and focus. Having used the new lead pipe a while, I am a bit conflicted.
Compared to the Conn S, a lot of the warmness and colorful overtones seem to have disappeared, at least behind the bell. The horn also seems noticably less nimble and flexible. Getting clarity at softer dynamics does seem a bit easier, and at louder dynamics, there is a new edge and ring that I think I could get to peel paint if needed. Scary.
However...mission accomplished? I just had a rehearsal with the Star Wars Suite, a Mandalorian Arrangement, and Mars on the program, and our principal horn dropped by to compliment how great I was sounding, mentioning very clear articulations and a powerful, open sound ("like the movies"). We had played together for years, but not the last concert cycle, and I had never gotten that kind of feedback before. They had assumed I had been practicing a ton more, and while I had been working on mindfulness and intentionality with my playing and fundamentals...not diligently enough to transform my playing.
I suppose my takeaway has been that the MK42 doesn't *feel* natural on the 88H, but has transformed it (for me) into a much more effective principal orchestral horn. The stock leadpipe will be kept around in case I ever get chamber opportunities again.
A little while ago I asked for advice here about a small crack in my 88H's lead pipe, which I had pulled/threaded. Consensus seemed to be that it was fine (it was once I got used to the negligible change in feel from the heavier, threaded receiver and added length), a great pipe, and not worth experimenting with.
Stubborn and curious, I picked up a nickel silver MK42 lead pipe (MK's take on an MV42) that was in stock...a completely different set up from the more open, shorter yellow brass Conn pipe. I had looked at Brass Ark's MV42, per recommendation from Noah, but it would have been a long wait time, and much more than I cared to pay for an experiment.
I've had this 88H in some form since 8th grade, and always got glowing compliments on my tone/sound concept with it. One observation I've had is that I consistently get lost or buried on principal parts. I think a lot of this is just my playing style, but with the 88H, projection and cutting through when needed just felt like an uphill, losing battle, particularly in the community orchestra I play in where the Bass Trombonist has a HUGE, wide, aggressive sound concept. I had the horn rebuilt last year with an Instrument Innovations valve, which improved the horn's resonance, lower register, centering, and overall playability significantly (albeit making the horn a bit heavier and more of an air hog), but left it's original character mostly alone.
My hope with the new lead pipe was that the nickel would add a little more cutting brilliance and crisper articulations, and that the Bach style pipe might add a little more welcomed resistance (to counter the open valve) and focus. Having used the new lead pipe a while, I am a bit conflicted.
Compared to the Conn S, a lot of the warmness and colorful overtones seem to have disappeared, at least behind the bell. The horn also seems noticably less nimble and flexible. Getting clarity at softer dynamics does seem a bit easier, and at louder dynamics, there is a new edge and ring that I think I could get to peel paint if needed. Scary.
However...mission accomplished? I just had a rehearsal with the Star Wars Suite, a Mandalorian Arrangement, and Mars on the program, and our principal horn dropped by to compliment how great I was sounding, mentioning very clear articulations and a powerful, open sound ("like the movies"). We had played together for years, but not the last concert cycle, and I had never gotten that kind of feedback before. They had assumed I had been practicing a ton more, and while I had been working on mindfulness and intentionality with my playing and fundamentals...not diligently enough to transform my playing.
I suppose my takeaway has been that the MK42 doesn't *feel* natural on the 88H, but has transformed it (for me) into a much more effective principal orchestral horn. The stock leadpipe will be kept around in case I ever get chamber opportunities again.