Lexcerpts
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2021 10:51 am
https://www.lexcerpts.com/
Very strange. What is this even supposed to mean?
Very strange. What is this even supposed to mean?
I don't take offense at it. It is what it is. The question is whether it was used as a means to try to poke the Millennials.
Exceptt that you've been directly told on a number of these threads how offensive some of the things you defend are. It's also been pointed out that the words you've used are deeply offensive (and had this pointed out by members of those communities). You've continually dismissed it when this has been brought up or insultingly dismissed those who have pointed it out. Since the threads where this was pointed out by a sizable portion of the community you've doubled down by constantly warning people about the "woke" portion of the community instead of taking an opportunity to listen, learn, or challenge yourself to consider that maybe you might be wrong or have things you need to consider, so I really struggle to see how you can say that you wouldn't intentionally insult anyone given how different your actions on these threads have been.
Agreed.WilliamLang wrote: Sun Oct 17, 2021 10:35 pm nothing. someone made that website to troll people, and it doesn't deserve anymore attention.
Note that at that time Minstrelsy was considered proper entertainment, although I don't know how Black folks of the era felt about it (they may just have shut up and avoided any controversy since complaining could get you killed). This type of entertainment lasted until the 1940s with Amos 'n Andy (two white actors in blackface) and Jack Benny's chauffeur, Rochester (Ed Anderson, an African-American actor).Texas native Le Roy "Lasses" White, whose last name gave away his birth race, but his stage persona and appearance for many years suggested otherwise.
His birth name was Leroy Robert White, but he put it through various permutations during his adult life, Leroy, born in Wills Point, Texas, was the youngest child of Texas natives Edmond Charleston White and Panola Martin Hatchett. His older siblings included Anna Mae (9/27/1874), Leta "Lettie" Ann 10/11/1876), Robert Quinn (10/17/1878), William Edmond (9/3/1880), and Edna Earle (9/11/1882). The 1880 census showed Edmond to be a farmer in Cherokee County, Texas. He died at some point during the early-to-mid-1890s, leaving Panola and her children to fend for themselves. The 1900 enumeration found the family living in Dallas, Texas, with Panola and Edna working as seamstresses, Robert as a blacksmith, and William as an apprentice in a machine shop. Leroy was still in school at age 11.
It is not clear what type of music education Leroy received either in the Dallas schools or privately, but he showed a natural talent for entertaining, and was inspired by some of the shows he saw coming through Dallas in the 1900s. Among those that he found a connection with was the soon to be dying institution of minstrelsy, that of white entertainers (sometimes black as well), many in blackface, emulating alleged Negro entertainment with comedy sketches of questionable merit, and a variety of old-time songs.lasses' blues cover Many, including Leroy (and ultimately nationally famous entertainers Al Jolson and Eddie Cantor, considered blackface entertainment to be an homage to the black race. Jolson even commented that it helped to amplify the expression of his mouth and eyes from the seats in the back of the room. It remains controversial a century and more later, but minstrelsy was still a viable competitor to vaudeville and stage musicals as late as the 1910s, albeit on the decline by that time.
Honest question, how did you even find this?JCBone wrote: Sun Oct 17, 2021 10:51 am https://www.lexcerpts.com/
Very strange. What is this even supposed to mean?
And now it's not.BGuttman wrote: Mon Oct 18, 2021 7:02 am
Note that at that time Minstrelsy was considered proper entertainment,
No.BGuttman wrote: Mon Oct 18, 2021 7:02 am
Minstrelsy and the music of the genre should be appreciated for itself and merits (or lack thereof) just like we consider Motets or Fusion Jazz.
So, help me to understand.Burgerbob wrote: Mon Oct 18, 2021 8:15 amAnd now it's not.BGuttman wrote: Mon Oct 18, 2021 7:02 am
Note that at that time Minstrelsy was considered proper entertainment,
![]()
No.BGuttman wrote: Mon Oct 18, 2021 7:02 am
Minstrelsy and the music of the genre should be appreciated for itself and merits (or lack thereof) just like we consider Motets or Fusion Jazz.
![]()
It's been done by me and many others at this point. No thanks.
I'll make this a one-and-done then escape, because I know what is likely to happen.BGuttman wrote:
Minstrelsy and the music of the genre should be appreciated for itself and merits (or lack thereof) just like we consider Motets or Fusion Jazz.
+1. Seriously.
I disagree. It seems to me that this thread—and the other thread discussing Doug Yeo’s article on Fillmore’s Lassus Trombone—are healthy discussions that need to take place not only for musicians, but (more importantly) for the public at large.
I agree. (I know I said I'd leave but this seemed like it needed to be said.)Kbiggs wrote: Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:28 amI disagree. It seems to me that this thread—and the other thread discussing Doug Yeo’s article on Fillmore’s Lassus Trombone—are healthy discussions that need to take place not only for musicians, but (more importantly) for the public at large.
I believe we can disagree without being disagreeable, and we can acknowledge other’s views without judging them.
I disagree with some of what is written on this and that other thread, but I respect the many individuals involved in the discussion, even when their arguments may be invalid and when I do not share their beliefs.
Someone sent me a digital copy of the book and I opened it up and clicked by accident on some link.Burgerbob wrote: Mon Oct 18, 2021 8:14 amHonest question, how did you even find this?JCBone wrote: Sun Oct 17, 2021 10:51 am https://www.lexcerpts.com/
Very strange. What is this even supposed to mean?
Context matters; material that "punches up" is usually less harmful than material that "punches down." All of the examples you pose seem questionable at the least, but, for example, "what about discrimination against the Irish?" is a lazy and mostly ahistoric cop-out to avoid grappling with America's legacy of anti-Blackness.BGuttman wrote: Mon Oct 18, 2021 9:17 am So, help me to understand.
You disapprove of any bad representation of African-Americans because it's in poor taste.
Do you also disapprove of any of the following?
The comic strip "Bringing Up Father" for its portrayal of Irish-Americans as uncultured louts?
The song "Baba-Lou" for its portrayal of Hispanics as uncultured boobs?
Sixtus Beckmesser in "Die Meistersinger" portraying Jews as officious nerds? Shylock in "The Merchant of Venice" portraying Jews as venial?
Or are you solely concerned about not looking "uncaring about Blacks"?
Note that many ethnic minorities have each taken a turn "in the barrel" at being scorned by White America. For that matter, even Mormons.
I say we can't undo history; we can only try to not follow its more offensive teachings.
Aaaand...the requisite "whataboutism". Yawn.Bach5G wrote: Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:52 am Well, as long as we’re having a discussion, here are a couple of things that I’ve been thinking about:
1. J Gruden nails the woke unholy Trinity in his emails: racism, mysogyny and homophobia. Some black players have stood up for him (not sure if any women or gay men have). Is it possible that Gruden is just a jerk?
2. Last night was pride night at the MLS soccer game. Present and prominent in the pre-game ceremonies was CS, a local drag celebrity who, among other contributions, performed a heavily camped up version of the national anthem. I wondered: is the gay community embarrassed by this stereotype (sort of like “minstrelsy”) For example, the team could have had the Vancouver Men’s Chorus sing both anthems in a musical, tasteful, and dignified way. Or, assuming drag is a characteristic or traditional component of gay culture, does the gay community resent the straight culture for misappropriation and other gay men for selling out?
It wasn’t intended as such. I’m sorry you interpreted it that way.brassmedic wrote: Mon Oct 18, 2021 11:39 pmAaaand...the requisite "whataboutism". Yawn.Bach5G wrote: Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:52 am Well, as long as we’re having a discussion, here are a couple of things that I’ve been thinking about:
I'm sorry you posted it.Bach5G wrote: Tue Oct 19, 2021 10:07 amIt wasn’t intended as such. I’m sorry you interpreted it that way.
I’ll meet you half way on this Brad. See above.brassmedic wrote: Tue Oct 19, 2021 12:22 pmI'm sorry you posted it.Bach5G wrote: Tue Oct 19, 2021 10:07 am
It wasn’t intended as such. I’m sorry you interpreted it that way.
Yes. Of course. What was I thinking?brassmedic wrote: Tue Oct 19, 2021 12:54 pm Well you're not going to succeed in turning this into a friendly discussion. It is already a huge train wreck. Sorry to say, you're just making things worse.
No idea.Bach5G wrote: Tue Oct 19, 2021 2:37 pmYes. Of course. What was I thinking?brassmedic wrote: Tue Oct 19, 2021 12:54 pm Well you're not going to succeed in turning this into a friendly discussion. It is already a huge train wreck. Sorry to say, you're just making things worse.