Re: A moment to vent about Bachs
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 7:08 pm
Those look great. The finish on photo 3 is masterful.
Matthew made a great 36C out of an old 36C. Probably the best medium bore I've ever played. With and without valve.hornbuilder wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2023 6:45 pm Just a few examples of the sort of work I do. I have rebuilt "many" (I have lost count, but it is easily in the triple digits including those done previously in Australia, then Greenhoe and M&W) Bach and Conn trombones for clients (as well as Edwards, Shires, Holton, Yamaha, you name it) I'm more than happy to discuss possible projects with people.
Nice. Single/plug-in/dependent/?WGWTR180 wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 7:59 am I would like to echo what others have said. Matthew did a Holton 185 conversion for me that turned out amazingly well! His workmanship is tops and the instrument retained most, if not all, of the characteristic Holton sound that I love.
Some pics would be nice!WGWTR180 wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 7:59 am I would like to echo what others have said. Matthew did a Holton 185 conversion for me that turned out amazingly well! His workmanship is tops and the instrument retained most, if not all, of the characteristic Holton sound that I love.
Your horns are beautiful!hornbuilder wrote: Thu Dec 07, 2023 6:45 pm Just a few examples of the sort of work I do. I have rebuilt "many" (I have lost count, but it is easily in the triple digits including those done previously in Australia, then Greenhoe and M&W) Bach and Conn trombones for clients (as well as Edwards, Shires, Holton, Yamaha, you name it) I'm more than happy to discuss possible projects with people.
Actually, as I already own 3 dependent models, I opted for an independent setup. It took me awhile to find a pipe that's suitable but now that I have that in order it's great!!!ithinknot wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:01 amNice. Single/plug-in/dependent/?WGWTR180 wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 7:59 am I would like to echo what others have said. Matthew did a Holton 185 conversion for me that turned out amazingly well! His workmanship is tops and the instrument retained most, if not all, of the characteristic Holton sound that I love.
Will post soon BUT the 2nd bell section that Matt posted above looks like mine!!!CalgaryTbone wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:39 amSome pics would be nice!WGWTR180 wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 7:59 am I would like to echo what others have said. Matthew did a Holton 185 conversion for me that turned out amazingly well! His workmanship is tops and the instrument retained most, if not all, of the characteristic Holton sound that I love.
JS
Matthew, are you still doing this kind of restoration work at M&W, or are you only focused on your line of original horns right now?hornbuilder wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2023 11:06 am Two Holton conversions that I've done.
The client didn't want the bell refinished on the dependent bass.
Would a King 3BF (.508) be a candidate for a valve replacement or is the bore too small? Sorry for all the questions, but those conversion pics are absolutely ridiculous, in a good way.hornbuilder wrote: Sat Dec 09, 2023 7:38 am I'm more than happy to do restoration/refurbish work in conjunction with M&W valve section conversions.
What horn would you say moves the most? (for adult players, that is)ZacharyThornton wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2023 10:32 pm I haven’t seen a new Bach post Covid that I would sell. I work QC for a large music store in Texas as my day job. I will not go into details because I do not like kicking people while they are down, but I have gone through at least 50 different Bach 42s of different specs. I would not feel comfortable selling even one of them to a student.
When someone comes in to do a fitting with me, I don’t even show a Bach anymore.
Well, I bought my new centennial Bach for less than 4000 usd in 2021. I picked the best playing combination of two/three gold bell sections and five lightweight slides. There was some alignment issues with the slide I discovered later that was fixed by a good tech during a service I would have done anyway. Now I really can't complain. Orchestral trombonists playing Thein, M&W, Greenhoe, early Edwards and early Shires are all impressed when trying it. I even got an offer to trade it for one of this horns. In other words, why paying usd 2000 more for a boutique made horn when you can fix any alignment issues for next to nothing? Given that you prefer the Bach sound, off course.harrisonreed wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2023 10:46 am I wish I could give you sympathy, but Bach is terrible. There has only been one I've ever tried that I would want to play in any performance. That one single horn, out of tens of others I've tried, was beautiful!
The stories of people "finding the one" are kind of humorous because for the prices Bach is charging you can go to Edwards or Shires (or one of their dealers) and walk out with a Bach style horn that plays great and have no issues. Or even buy one sight unseen. You can't do that with Bach. Bach is charging $5500 for low quality builds.
There are people who sound very great on Bach, but some are big names from the past who claim they tried 10+ bells and multiple slides to create their perfect Bach. Sorry but that's not "playing on Bach", that's building your own horn by sifting through junk. Or people who mate Mt Vernon bells to Shires or Edwards setups -- again, that's just underlining how bad the Bach build quality is.
I can sympathize that you like the Bach sound, and you like the design concept. There is absolutely something special there. But in order to "fix" Bach, you need to vote with your wallet. I personally would not give them any money for what they are producing. They will continue to produce broken, low quality builds as long as people keep buying them.
You're close... The straight 36 is even better. And definitely the best Bach trombone ever made.
I haven't played a straight 36, but I had a 1976 36B for a while (replaced with a Conn 79H) and really liked it.JoeAumann wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 11:08 pmYou're close... The straight 36 is even better. And definitely the best Bach trombone ever made.![]()
I would rather say the American corporate ethic. Once a factory gets big enough and everyone's on piecework, well you get what you pay for. It was Macmillan that trashed Conn when they moved out of Elkhart.Posaunus wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 11:51 am All this makes me very sad, and is perhaps an unfortunate consequence of the deterioration of the American work ethic, and perhaps American culture at large.Our brass instruments were once (at least among) the best in the world. Now it's only a few manufacturers who can proudly raise their banners.
From craftsmen... to corporations. The focus always changes. It has to. The leadership of a corporation has a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit for shareholders.sf105 wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 2:23 amI would rather say the American corporate ethic. Once a factory gets big enough and everyone's on piecework, well you get what you pay for. It was Macmillan that trashed Conn when they moved out of Elkhart.Posaunus wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 11:51 am All this makes me very sad, and is perhaps an unfortunate consequence of the deterioration of the American work ethic, and perhaps American culture at large.Our brass instruments were once (at least among) the best in the world. Now it's only a few manufacturers who can proudly raise their banners.
Here we had Boosey and Hawkes, which prospered in the closed market of the British Empire and military band contracts, and collapsed as soon as there was real competition.
I wish it was a work ethic thing, but it’s the realities of working a factory job in the US these days. Hard to bring perfectionist standards to your workplace when you have no chance for upward mobility in the company and your paychecks barely cover your costs of living.Posaunus wrote: Sat Jan 06, 2024 11:51 am All this makes me very sad, and is perhaps an unfortunate consequence of the deterioration of the American work ethic, and perhaps American culture at large.Our brass instruments were once (at least among) the best in the world. Now it's only a few manufacturers who can proudly raise their banners.
I have a small collection of "vintage" trombones which I will happily play until I can't. They have personality, were well-made, are easy-to-maintain, and (to my ears) sound great. As they say, they don't make 'em like they used to!
They also have a responsibility for not driving the company into the ground because they haven't understood their market. Yamaha, for example, don't seem to suffer from the same problems.afugate wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:17 am From craftsmen... to corporations. The focus always changes. It has to. The leadership of a corporation has a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit for shareholders.
--Andy in OKC
FWIW, Conn-Selmer is owned by Paulson and Co, a closed hedge fund. It doesn't answer to shareholders in the traditional sense, and from what I can tell a lot of what it does involves complex bets, including shorting investments, derivatives, and formerly subprime mortgages. I don't think the investors could care less about how C-S runs as a company, because they can likely bet against it as it fails.afugate wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:17 amFrom craftsmen... to corporations. The focus always changes. It has to. The leadership of a corporation has a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit for shareholders.sf105 wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 2:23 am
I would rather say the American corporate ethic. Once a factory gets big enough and everyone's on piecework, well you get what you pay for. It was Macmillan that trashed Conn when they moved out of Elkhart.
Here we had Boosey and Hawkes, which prospered in the closed market of the British Empire and military band contracts, and collapsed as soon as there was real competition.
--Andy in OKC
Is that really true? (Just because Milton Friedman said so?)afugate wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:17 am The leadership of a corporation has a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit for shareholders.
--Andy in OKC
Uncle Milty was wrong about a lot of things, and this is one of them. To see that Friedman was wrong, one need only consider not-for-profit corporations: they exist and they can make money, but they can't return those profits to shareholders as dividends or increased share prices.Posaunus wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 4:33 pmIs that really true? (Just because Milton Friedman said so?)afugate wrote: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:17 am The leadership of a corporation has a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit for shareholders.
--Andy in OKC
Long-term or short-term?
Is greed good?
Is profit the only reason to invest in a corporation?
Is profit maximization a corporation's only responsibility?
What about their employees?
Their customers?
Their community?
Management / corporate ethic decline is as significant as is their employees'.
Bach had several brand new draw benches made from converted horizontal broaching machines last time I was there. Their brazing process seemed similar to other manufacturers using fusion paste.Rundquist wrote: Sat Jul 05, 2025 9:38 am A repair guy told me that Bach never bothered to recalibrate and tighten their machinery. That’s why their horns were always all over the place. Their slide extrusions were never consistently straight. He showed me looking down them under fluorescent light. King on the other hand always had (for the most part) straight slide extrusions. When they all came under one roof, Bach did liberate one of the King manufacturing benches, so that has helped them. The dark sound that some people like with Bach is because the bells are heated up almost to melting in the manufacturing process. It’s also why their bells are so brittle.