Benge 175F Production quality defects
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Benge 175F Production quality defects
I found new benge 175F
Last edited by Tubaaiyue on Tue Jul 07, 2026 8:34 pm, edited 5 times in total.
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 6219
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
- JohnL
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:01 am
Re: New Benge 175F!How much is appropriate?
Proceed with caution. There's a reason it's never been used. It could be that it just got pushed into a corner and forgotten
. OTOH, it may have had some issue that caused people not to buy it, or to buy it and never play it. 
Last edited by JohnL on Mon Apr 20, 2026 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Posaunus
- Posts: 4854
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Re: New Benge 175F!How much is appropriate?
Caveat emptor
-
chromebone
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 4:29 pm
Re: New Benge 175F!How much is appropriate?
What are the circumstances of this situation? Is it an instrument that was in the back of a music store for 30 years? The estate of someone who never got around to playing it?
Assuming you are able to verify its condition, that is a good price.
Assuming you are able to verify its condition, that is a good price.
- Oslide
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2018 9:13 am
Re: New Benge 175F!How much is appropriate?
In 2019, by chance I dug up a straight Benge 175 online at a music shop in Hongkong. It was described as NOS (New Old Stock). I got it for HK$6,000 (reduced from HK$13,000), plus a very substantial fee for handling and transportation.
When it arrived it really looked like new and sounded great, but immediately it showed that the distance between bell rim and slide (ca. 0.7 inch) was uncomfortably close. Moreover there was a clear slide problem between 2nd and 3rd position.
To have these flaws corrected turned out to be more difficult and expensive than I expected. Today, however, I can say this really is a great horn well worth the efforts taken!
I'm pretty sure these flaws were the reason the horn was still around after a long time (serial number 159nnn points to 1986?). As others have cautioned before, you could be in for surprises.
Good luck!
When it arrived it really looked like new and sounded great, but immediately it showed that the distance between bell rim and slide (ca. 0.7 inch) was uncomfortably close. Moreover there was a clear slide problem between 2nd and 3rd position.
To have these flaws corrected turned out to be more difficult and expensive than I expected. Today, however, I can say this really is a great horn well worth the efforts taken!
I'm pretty sure these flaws were the reason the horn was still around after a long time (serial number 159nnn points to 1986?). As others have cautioned before, you could be in for surprises.
Good luck!
Ceterum censeo to fetch All of TTF
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Re: New Benge 175F!How much is appropriate?
Yes, it's in the music store, benge 175Fchromebone wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2026 12:28 pm What are the circumstances of this situation? Is it an instrument that was in the back of a music store for 30 years? The estate of someone who never got around to playing it?
Assuming you are able to verify its condition, that is a good price.
Last edited by Tubaaiyue on Mon Apr 20, 2026 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Re: New Benge 175F!How much is appropriate?
.
Last edited by Tubaaiyue on Mon Apr 20, 2026 10:33 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Re: New Benge 175F!How much is appropriate?
This is a trombone produced in the 1990s. Was the quality of King factory's products stable during this period
-
Posaunus
- Posts: 4854
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Re: New Benge 175F!How much is appropriate?
Do you know the serial number?
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Re: New Benge 175F!How much is appropriate?
I'm not sure at the moment. I'll go and ask about it this afternoon. The store previously told me that this is a trombone produced in the 1990s
- LeTromboniste
- Posts: 1619
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:22 am
Re: New Benge 175F!How much is appropriate?
Is that the one in Milan? I very strongly considered buying it in December.
Maximilien Brisson
www.maximilienbrisson.com
Lecturer for baroque trombone,
Hfk Bremen/University of the Arts Bremen
www.maximilienbrisson.com
Lecturer for baroque trombone,
Hfk Bremen/University of the Arts Bremen
- harrisonreed
- Posts: 6329
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:18 pm
Re: New Benge 175F!How much is appropriate?
King = generally good to really good, at all timesTubaaiyue wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2026 3:50 pm This is a trombone produced in the 1990s. Was the quality of King factory's products stable during this period![]()
Benge = generally really good, at all times
- Harrison Reed
Harry's Custom Mouthpieces
Harry's Custom Mouthpieces
-
Posaunus
- Posts: 4854
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Re: Benge 175F How much is appropriate?
Benge trombone production in the 1980s - ~2005 (in the King factory in Eastlake, Ohio) was generally very good.
No factory problems that I know of during that time period.
I've played a few Benge trombones (but not a 175F). - they were all fine instruments.
No factory problems that I know of during that time period.
I've played a few Benge trombones (but not a 175F). - they were all fine instruments.
-
Posaunus
- Posts: 4854
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Re: Benge 175F How much is appropriate?
Benge trombone production in the mid-1980s to ~2005 (in the King factory in Eastlake, Ohio) was generally very good.
No factory problems that I know of during that time period.
I've played a few Benge trombones (but not a 175F) - they were all fine instruments.
No factory problems that I know of during that time period.
I've played a few Benge trombones (but not a 175F) - they were all fine instruments.
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Re: Benge 175F How much is appropriate?
Ok!thank you all for your messages. I have seen all of them, Thank you everybody 
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Re: Benge 175F How much is appropriate?
Is the Benge 6 1/2 mouthpiece a copy of the Bach 6 1/2? This new trombone comes with a complimentary Benge mouthpiece
-
Posaunus
- Posts: 4854
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Re: Benge 175F How much is appropriate?
The Benge mouthpiece is probably their (King's) attempt to copy a Bach mouthpiece.Tubaaiyue wrote: Wed Apr 22, 2026 11:15 am Is the Benge 6 1/2 mouthpiece a copy of the Bach 6 1/2? This new trombone comes with a complimentary Benge mouthpiece
But which one? Bach lists three 6½ mouthpieces: 6½A, 6½AM, and 6½AL. They are all different.
[Not to mention the rather wide variation in "authentic" Bach mouthpieces.]
I would guess a 6½AM or 6½AL size would work best with a Benge 175F trombone.
Try the mouthpiece that's shipped with your "new" trombone. If you don't like it, there are countless alternatives.
- JohnL
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:01 am
Re: New Benge 175F How much is appropriate?
I suspect it's a Benge 6 1/2 AL-S. I seem to recall hearing that they were basically a Benge rendition of a Bach 6½AL.
There was also a Benge 6 1/2 AL-L, which I think was Benge's version of a Bach large-shank 6½A (i.e., it had a standard large shank throat and backbore rather than have the same throat and backbore as its small-shank stablemate).
There was also a Benge 6 1/2 AL-L, which I think was Benge's version of a Bach large-shank 6½A (i.e., it had a standard large shank throat and backbore rather than have the same throat and backbore as its small-shank stablemate).
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Re: New Benge 175F!How much is appropriate?
.
Last edited by Tubaaiyue on Tue Jul 07, 2026 6:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Re: New Benge 175F!How much is appropriate?
Oslide wrote: Mon Apr 20, 2026 1:29 pm In 2019, by chance I dug up a straight Benge 175 online at a music shop in Hongkong. It was described as NOS (New Old Stock). I got it for HK$6,000 (reduced from HK$13,000), plus a very substantial fee for handling and transportation.
When it arrived it really looked like new and sounded great, but immediately it showed that the distance between bell rim and slide (ca. 0.7 inch) was uncomfortably close. Moreover there was a clear slide problem between 2nd and 3rd position.
To have these flaws corrected turned out to be more difficult and expensive than I expected. Today, however, I can say this really is a great horn well worth the efforts taken!
I'm pretty sure these flaws were the reason the horn was still around after a long time (serial number 159nnn points to 1986?). As others have cautioned before, you could be in for surprises.
Good luck!![]()
Just like you trombone, my 175 slide is also very close to the Bell distance, and I also encountered the problem of slow slide...
-
AtomicClock
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2023 8:01 pm
Re: New Benge 175F How much is appropriate?
slow slide? slide-to-bell distance too small? Sounds like someone knocked it and its stand over. Happened to my 42. Sigh.
- hyperbolica
- Posts: 3880
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:31 am
Re: New Benge 175F How much is appropriate?
The bell-to-slide-gap on mine is 1.023". This is after having been rebuilt by Scott Sweeney, so I'm not sure that's factory spec, but it's comfortable to play at that distance.
The mouthpiece that I use is a DE xt104 D+ 4. Bach 6 1/2 is roughly a C or D cup in the DE universe. I can say it seems to like smaller rather than larger mouthpieces. The closest off-the-shelf mouthpiece to that would be a Conn 4CL, or maybe a Schilke 52 according to Doug's 25 year old chart. So my DE has a significantly bigger inside diameter, but a similar depth.
The sound of the horn has been described by my quartet-mates as rather "tenory", meaning kind of bright.
Just buy the horn and deal with any shortcomings later. They are rare enough and unique enough that dealing with issues should be minor in comparison to owning one of these. It is different from a 3b+. I find the 3b family to have some unpleasant overtones, and the Benge seems to sort those out, probably the difference being the bell treatment. Mine was gone over by Sweeney, so it might not be a great example of the breed, but maybe a good example of what they are capable of.
The mouthpiece that I use is a DE xt104 D+ 4. Bach 6 1/2 is roughly a C or D cup in the DE universe. I can say it seems to like smaller rather than larger mouthpieces. The closest off-the-shelf mouthpiece to that would be a Conn 4CL, or maybe a Schilke 52 according to Doug's 25 year old chart. So my DE has a significantly bigger inside diameter, but a similar depth.
The sound of the horn has been described by my quartet-mates as rather "tenory", meaning kind of bright.
Just buy the horn and deal with any shortcomings later. They are rare enough and unique enough that dealing with issues should be minor in comparison to owning one of these. It is different from a 3b+. I find the 3b family to have some unpleasant overtones, and the Benge seems to sort those out, probably the difference being the bell treatment. Mine was gone over by Sweeney, so it might not be a great example of the breed, but maybe a good example of what they are capable of.
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Re: New Benge 175F How much is appropriate?
I discovered something hilarious a few minutes ago. The slide on this trombone seems to be installed upside down. If I put the slide on upside down, the effect is 8/10. If I put the slide on right side up, the effect is only 6/10,Could it be that there are solder residues inside this brand new slide?
(Today is the first time I have used this trombone)
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Re: New Benge 175F How much is appropriate?
It's really infuriating to encounter such quality issues 
Last edited by Tubaaiyue on Tue Jul 07, 2026 8:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
-
Posaunus
- Posts: 4854
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Re: New Benge 175F How much is appropriate?
Of course you can't return this "new" (20+ -year-old) trombone to the factory to have the slide issues addressed.Tubaaiyue wrote: Tue Jul 07, 2026 8:21 pm I discovered something hilarious a few minutes ago. The slide on this trombone seems to be installed upside down. If I put the slide on upside down, the effect is 8/10. If I put the slide on right side up, the effect is only 6/10,Could it be that there are solder residues inside this brand new slide?(Today is the first time I have used this trombone)
[Probably not solder residue or upside-down assembly.]
You need a knowledgeable, competent trombone repair tech. Good luck!
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Re: New Benge 175F How much is appropriate?
You are right. Thank you, PosaunesPosaunus wrote: Tue Jul 07, 2026 8:40 pmOf course you can't return this "new" (20+ -year-old) trombone to the factory to have the slide issues addressed.Tubaaiyue wrote: Tue Jul 07, 2026 8:21 pm I discovered something hilarious a few minutes ago. The slide on this trombone seems to be installed upside down. If I put the slide on upside down, the effect is 8/10. If I put the slide on right side up, the effect is only 6/10,Could it be that there are solder residues inside this brand new slide?(Today is the first time I have used this trombone)
[Probably not solder residue or upside-down assembly.]
You need a knowledgeable, competent trombone repair tech. Good luck!
- Oslide
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2018 9:13 am
Re: Benge 175F Production quality defects
Tubaaiyue wrote: Tue Jul 07, 2026 5:48 pm Just like you trombone, my 175 slide is also very close to the Bell distance, and I also encountered the problem of slow slide...
I empathize with you...Posaunus wrote: Tue Jul 07, 2026 8:40 pm ...You need a knowledgeable, competent trombone repair tech. Good luck!
Follow Posaunus' advice and you will get a great trombone.
Ceterum censeo to fetch All of TTF
-
Doldom
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2018 8:34 am
Re: Benge 175F Production quality defects
Benge bones are originally have small bell to slide distance.
My 175 has like 0.94 inch distance, and 190 is also not different and has like just an 1 inch distance.
The slow slide, maybe it's not a quality defects. All the horn might need is just a chemical and ultrasound bath from a competent trombone repair tech.
My 175 has like 0.94 inch distance, and 190 is also not different and has like just an 1 inch distance.
The slow slide, maybe it's not a quality defects. All the horn might need is just a chemical and ultrasound bath from a competent trombone repair tech.
-
tbonesullivan
- Posts: 1935
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:06 am
Re: Benge 175F Production quality defects
THIS. If that truly is one that has been "sitting around" for at least two decades, that's plenty of time for stuff to happen to it, like oxides building up inside. A good chem clean and a good tech should have it going great.Doldom wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2026 8:03 amThe slow slide, maybe it's not a quality defects. All the horn might need is just a chemical and ultrasound bath from a competent trombone repair tech.
David S. - daveyboy37 from TTF
Bach 39, LT36B, 42BOF & 42T, King 2103 / 3b, Kanstul 1570CR & 1588CR, Yamaha YBL-612 RII, YBL-822G & YBL-830, Sterling 1056GHS Euphonium,
Livingston Symphony Orchestra NJ - Trombone
Bach 39, LT36B, 42BOF & 42T, King 2103 / 3b, Kanstul 1570CR & 1588CR, Yamaha YBL-612 RII, YBL-822G & YBL-830, Sterling 1056GHS Euphonium,
Livingston Symphony Orchestra NJ - Trombone
-
chromebone
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 4:29 pm
Re: Benge 175F Production quality defects
I don’t have a 175, but I have a few 190’s. The bell to slide distance is closer on the earlier production ones than the later production example. I think it was just the way they made the earlier versions. Benges were probably the best out-of-the-case horn in terms of quality at the time of their introduction.
The only quality issue with Benges that I’ve encountered was sometimes the silver soldered joint where the cross brace is connected to the slide receiver would separate, requiring the receiver to be removed from the horn due to the higher heat required to braze the silver to reattach it.
The only quality issue with Benges that I’ve encountered was sometimes the silver soldered joint where the cross brace is connected to the slide receiver would separate, requiring the receiver to be removed from the horn due to the higher heat required to braze the silver to reattach it.
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Re: Benge 175F Production quality defects
What slide oil does everyone use for their trombone? I'm using Side O Mix
-
Tubaaiyue
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:26 am
Re: Benge 175F Production quality defects
Maybe my oil isn't suitable for Benge trombone
-
Posaunus
- Posts: 4854
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Re: Benge 175F Production quality defects
SlideOMix and SlideOMix "Rapid Comfort" are great for trombones like the Benge 175 - as is Yamaha Slide Lubricant.
Your slide doesn't need a better lubricant - just attention from a qualifed trombone technician.
Your slide doesn't need a better lubricant - just attention from a qualifed trombone technician.
-
chromebone
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 4:29 pm
Re: Benge 175F Production quality defects
I use Yamaha slide lubricant on mine, very sparingly, and it works great. Benge slides are King slides, which means they have pretty close tolerances.