Minick 88h Value

Post Reply
ryant
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 6:26 pm

Minick 88h Value

Post by ryant »

Hey Guys,

Considering selling my Minick. I can post some pictures later. I've kept an eye on two Minick's on BrassArk to judge current pricing, but I'm curious if the modification I had done would alter the price at all. It has two bells, an 88h #9 lacquered red brass bell and an un-lacquered Minick yellow bell. It has an SL4747 slide with gold brass tubes. I wasn't a huge fan of the Minick valve, so I had a Rotax valve section put on from an Alessi horn about a decade ago. The horn plays real nice, and the slide is at least 9/10. If adding the Rotax valve really hurts the value, I'll probably end up just keeping it.

Thanks,

Ryan
RJMason
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2018 2:04 pm

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by RJMason »

Guess we would have to see it? An original Minick valve in nice condition would certainly pique the interest of a collector but the Rotax is quite a nice valve itself. Two bells would be great. Did you just swap out the valves and keep as much of the original wrap and bracing intact? Or did you replace the entire valve section? That would certainly help or harm the price. The more Minick stamps the better.

That being said I think $3500 would be a solid bottom for a one bell horn, so with two, depending on condition something 4-5K makes sense to me.

If there are no markings left to indicate provenance I would expect it to go lower (sub $3K). I think it would be tough to sell the horn for $6K unless it also had the original valve section to swap on and maybe some extra bling like a straight gooseneck, extra Minick leadpipes or mouthpiece, etc.
ryant
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 6:26 pm

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by ryant »

Photos
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
ryant
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 6:26 pm

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by ryant »

I sent the horn off to Brad Close to have him install the valve section about 9-10 years ago. There is one stamp on a bell brace, but the other stamped braces were removed with the original valve section.

It has a straight gooseneck. The leadpipe has Minick 88 inscribed on it, though I don't have any other Minick made leadpipes to compare it to to know if it was a Minick original.
User avatar
SwissTbone
Posts: 1158
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 11:40 pm

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by SwissTbone »

ryant wrote: Sat Mar 28, 2026 9:01 am The leadpipe has Minick 88 inscribed on it, though I don't have any other Minick made leadpipes to compare it to to know if it was a Minick original.
Looks like the Minick leadpipes I know.
ƒƒ---------------------------------------------------ƒƒ
Like trombones? Head over to https://swisstbone.com/ to see some great vintage and custom horns!
chromebone
Posts: 445
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 4:29 pm

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by chromebone »

The Minicks with the Beryllium bells seem to be the ones that are the most desirable. They play like an 88h, but the sound is much more dense than a regular 88h bell. I own one that used to belong to Tyrone Breuninger of the Philadelphia Orchestra. I don’t play it much anymore, it sounds great, but it really doesn’t blend well with other horns. I also have a Minick alto with a beryllium bell as well, which is a fantastic instrument.
mrdeacon
Posts: 1259
Joined: Tue May 08, 2018 2:05 am

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by mrdeacon »

My Minick bass has a bell seam like that. I love the imperfect nature of those Minick bells. They really have a special mojo to them.

I would definitely suggest contacting the Brass Ark for selling a Minick. They’re hard to sell and the Brass Ark is one of the few places you can get solid exposure for a horn like that.
Rath R1, Rath R3, Rath R4, Rath R9, Minick Bass Trombone
WGWTR180
Posts: 2109
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:32 pm

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by WGWTR180 »

A fully original Minick instrument will hold more value to a purist who is looking for one than what you have even though your horn might be amazing. Just speaking from a value standpoint.
User avatar
slipmo
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 1:38 pm

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by slipmo »

Happy to help you with this one if you choose, you can send me an email at the website if interested https://brassark.com/contact/
User avatar
harrisonreed
Posts: 6329
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:18 pm

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by harrisonreed »

chromebone wrote: Sat Mar 28, 2026 6:29 pm The Minicks with the Beryllium bells seem to be the ones that are the most desirable. They play like an 88h, but the sound is much more dense than a regular 88h bell. I own one that used to belong to Tyrone Breuninger of the Philadelphia Orchestra. I don’t play it much anymore, it sounds great, but it really doesn’t blend well with other horns. I also have a Minick alto with a beryllium bell as well, which is a fantastic instrument.
Yeah, nothing sounds like those horns with that alloy. I'm usually of the opinion that the bell material is the least interesting thing about an instrument design ... But nothing sounds like those Minick bells. I definitely want one some day.
- Harrison Reed

Harry's Custom Mouthpieces
Doldom
Posts: 159
Joined: Sat May 12, 2018 8:34 am

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by Doldom »

Question,, if someone make a Beryllium bell, what alloy would someone use and what percent of metals the bell would be made of??
Would it be Beryllium copper(Cu-Be)? then maybe it would have similar properties with bronze(Cu-Sn)?
ryant
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 6:26 pm

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by ryant »

I'm gonna put this up for sale here shortly. I'll mention it in the ad too, but in these photos it has a Hölle tuning slide, that will NOT be included. I'll update the photos with the correct tuning slide.
User avatar
hyperbolica
Posts: 3880
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:31 am

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by hyperbolica »

Doldom wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2026 6:52 am Question,, if someone make a Beryllium bell, what alloy would someone use and what percent of metals the bell would be made of??
Would it be Beryllium copper(Cu-Be)? then maybe it would have similar properties with bronze(Cu-Sn)?
I've worked with beryllium copper in other applications. It is extremely hard, work hardens quickly, and will crack easily when worked. But it also can be annealed to soften it. I also remember there was something rather toxic about it. If I owned one, I would have it lacquered.
User avatar
harrisonreed
Posts: 6329
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:18 pm

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by harrisonreed »

hyperbolica wrote: Fri May 01, 2026 1:24 pm
Doldom wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2026 6:52 am Question,, if someone make a Beryllium bell, what alloy would someone use and what percent of metals the bell would be made of??
Would it be Beryllium copper(Cu-Be)? then maybe it would have similar properties with bronze(Cu-Sn)?
I've worked with beryllium copper in other applications. It is extremely hard, work hardens quickly, and will crack easily when worked. But it also can be annealed to soften it. I also remember there was something rather toxic about it. If I owned one, I would have it lacquered.
The dust from machining that metal is highly toxic when inhaled, especially pure beryllium. The bell itself shouldn't be.

Accoustically it's cool but the real application is that it's non-sparking. People use tools made of the stuff all the time and they are okay.
- Harrison Reed

Harry's Custom Mouthpieces
User avatar
JohnL
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:01 am

Re: Minick 88h Value

Post by JohnL »

Doldom wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2026 6:52 am Question,, if someone make a Beryllium bell, what alloy would someone use and what percent of metals the bell would be made of??
Would it be Beryllium copper(Cu-Be)? then maybe it would have similar properties with bronze(Cu-Sn)?
The original "beryllium" bells were beryllium copper. AFAIK, Schilke's modern "beryllium" bells don't actually contain any beryllium, they're just extra-thin copper.

Not sure what alloy Minick would have used; my guess would be UNS C17000 (aka Alloy 165); that's the less expensive of the two common, general purpose BeCu alloys.
Beryllium1.60-1.79%
Nickel + Cobalt, minimum0.20%
Nickel + Cobalt + Iron, maximum0.6%
Aluminum, maximum0.20%
Silicon, maximum0.20%
Copperbalance
harrisonreed wrote: Fri May 01, 2026 2:15 pmAccoustically it's cool but the real application is that it's non-sparking.
Non-sparking and non-magnetic. It's also used for electrical contacts and connectors where strength, wear, and/or fatigue resistance are needed; pure copper has better conductivity, but it wears out too quickly in high-cycle applications.
Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”