I believe almost everyone here has some experience with Yamaha’s Xeno family. Some like them, some hate them, some don‘t care. But Yamaha also has another “side” of large bore horns that they don’t (normally) export, the Japanese Domestic Market (JDM) horns, and I think they are much more interesting than most of the exported Xenos. Here are some of my thoughts.
YSL-820GII
The “old-school” Yamaha Custom (800-series) trombone, with a lineage that can be traced to the YSL-842 of the 80s. It has 8.5” gold brass bell with unsoldered rim, brass slide with faux oversleeve, nickel silver load-bearing parts (receiver, braces, oiter tuning slides, ferrules, etc.), and yellow brass tuning slide.
In my opinion, this horn is the most true to Yamaha’s original spirit: easy to play, light, with a wide sound that has a good halo to it. The projection is, as expected, worse than the Xeno family, but the sound is more lush and pleasing at least up close. To my surprise, my former band teacher, who has an extremely good ears and is normally a Bach fan, prefers this horn over Bach 42BOF that he even helped hand-pick for the band. The price is attractive also, at around 78% of the 882II which is currently the cheapest Xeno. A good horn for all-around playing for sure.
YSL-823GD
Nakagawa Eijirou’s signature large bore model. It follows his principle of all-brass horn and “lightering”: lightweight slide, thinner trim ring, among other lightering. The cut bell GD version has phosphor bronze valve cap instead of normal (I think aluminium) cap. The bell is 8.5” gold brass.
From my perception, the horn sound dry and “smoky”. It might be because I use a large mouthpiece when I tried it. Amaller mouthpiece should help bring additional brilliance to it, but that would exacerbate the dryness problem. The horn might be good for jazz and solo (the field which Nakagawa-san shines) but I would not use it in an orchestra or wind band.
YSL-825/825G
The newest model in Yamaha’s lineup, not counting variants of the existing models. The horn is developed with Kuwata Kou, the principal trombone of Yomiuri Nippon Orchestra. The most striking aspect of the horn is the weird valve wrap, designed to “make the air flow in the same direction for both F and main tube”. I don’t know how much that makes a difference, but it is the main selling point Yamaha pitches for this horn. In an interview between Yamaha’s horn designer and Kuwata-san, the latter mentioned that he used YSL-882V before, and the valve side has the aforementioned flow direction, so he wants the 825 to have that.
Other parts of the horn are unique as well. The slide is gold brass with yellow brass crook and narrow slide brace. The tuning slide is gold brass for both main and F side on the yellow-bell variant, but yellow brass on the gold-bell variant. The bell is 8.67” Xeno type, but I am not sure it is soldered or not, but it seems soldered. No cut bell option offered as of now.
I am indifferent with all Xeno tenors I have tried and owned (one 882UII JDM Xeno, one 882G, one 882O, and one 882OR). The OR I tried was too hollow, while the other models are compact and middle-of-the-road. I am starting to understand why some say “Yamaha is boring”. There is not much halo and lushness, just core. The 825, however, eliminates that problem. It strikes a balance between the wide sound of the 820GII and the core-heavy sound of the other Xenos. I can say if I am going to buy a tenor, this will be it. The valve, however, is not that free-blowing, owing to the weird valve wrap. But my friend said that valved notes sounds like open notes, so Yamaha does succeed on that point.
However, I only like the yellow brass variant YSL-825. The 825G gold brass variant does not impress me like its sibling.
It seems like Yamaha still has no plan to market the 825 in international market even though it is Xeno-branded, which is a pity. Yamaha Thailand managed to import a 825 and a 825G, and the 825 is sold relatively fast. In the market where not so many people can afford new horn, and most of those that can afford prefer Bach, Shires, Edwards, and some even Kühnl & Hoyer and Thein, a Yamaha horn with such a steep price tag (836,000 JPY VS 874,000 JPY of my YBL-835D bass) to be sold so fast can be considered a great success, and I believe it would sell well in other markets as well.
Here ends my brief review of the JDM large bore horns. Please share your thoughts especially if you have experience on these horns or JDM horn in general!
Some JDM Yamaha large tenors brief review
- sirisobhakya
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 8:04 pm
- Location: Bangkok, Thailand
- Contact:
Some JDM Yamaha large tenors brief review
Chaichan Wiriyaswat
Bangkok, Thailand
Bangkok, Thailand
-
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2018 2:04 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Some JDM Yamaha large tenors brief review
Thanks so much for all of this insight!!! I really want to try all of these horns.
I am especially curious about the 823GD as I don’t play in an orchestra much and I love the sound of the 895EN. However, that horn (after two trial periods) had too tight of a blow and felt a touch nose heavy. Maybe the valve and a tight large bore blow would feel more like a balanced medium despite the .547 size? How would you describe the blow? Dry and Smoky are cool with me I can very much work with that.
The 825 has a sterling silver leadpipe as well, correct? Seems to be very Alessi Model based.
In the US, I am going to spend some time with the 882OD and GOR end of this month. I played the 882GOR last December and I thought it sounded exactly like a Stephens Trombone I trialed…def not boring.
I am especially curious about the 823GD as I don’t play in an orchestra much and I love the sound of the 895EN. However, that horn (after two trial periods) had too tight of a blow and felt a touch nose heavy. Maybe the valve and a tight large bore blow would feel more like a balanced medium despite the .547 size? How would you describe the blow? Dry and Smoky are cool with me I can very much work with that.
The 825 has a sterling silver leadpipe as well, correct? Seems to be very Alessi Model based.
In the US, I am going to spend some time with the 882OD and GOR end of this month. I played the 882GOR last December and I thought it sounded exactly like a Stephens Trombone I trialed…def not boring.
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2018 8:34 am
- Location: South Korea
Re: Some JDM Yamaha large tenors brief review
I have 823G. (Not GD). It is indeed very lightweight and easy blowing, and have a more "BBAM" sound rather than "BUUH" sound,, if that makes sense..? More "ah" sound rather than "uhh" sound. I think it is very similar to 88H thin bell version. Very nimble and more electric brilliance(if that makes sense) at high dynamics, but not necessarily have thick body of sound that helps projection.
I also have 882, and definetely 882 has more body to the sound and volume limit is higher than 823.
But I think I like the 823 a lot for light orchestral repertoire or for first parts of orchestra. I think I can use it well in orchestras except heavy repertoire like Shostakovich,Mahler, Wagner, etc..
I even have the leadpipe pulled out and using some nickel silver or sterling silver aftermarket leadpipe. It helps a little more heaviness and more projection to the sound. But I think a little bit of the characteristic sound(a little blooming after the "BBAM") is lost during the process(I can't describe well with words,,)
These two videos may be helpful.
I can mostly agree with what he says with 823G and 882(although he is saying with 882V).
He also describes 823G sound as "BBAM".
823G sound.
882V sound.
GD(cut-bell version) may be different. Maybe GD version have a little more slotting and projection.
I also have 882, and definetely 882 has more body to the sound and volume limit is higher than 823.
But I think I like the 823 a lot for light orchestral repertoire or for first parts of orchestra. I think I can use it well in orchestras except heavy repertoire like Shostakovich,Mahler, Wagner, etc..
I even have the leadpipe pulled out and using some nickel silver or sterling silver aftermarket leadpipe. It helps a little more heaviness and more projection to the sound. But I think a little bit of the characteristic sound(a little blooming after the "BBAM") is lost during the process(I can't describe well with words,,)
These two videos may be helpful.
I can mostly agree with what he says with 823G and 882(although he is saying with 882V).
He also describes 823G sound as "BBAM".
823G sound.
882V sound.
GD(cut-bell version) may be different. Maybe GD version have a little more slotting and projection.
- sirisobhakya
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 8:04 pm
- Location: Bangkok, Thailand
- Contact:
Re: Some JDM Yamaha large tenors brief review
I tried the 823GD back in January so I don't remember the blow clearly, but if I remember correctly it is a bit tighter than the 825 on open horn, but the 825 is tighter on valve.RJMason wrote: Sun Oct 19, 2025 3:04 am Thanks so much for all of this insight!!! I really want to try all of these horns.
I am especially curious about the 823GD as I don’t play in an orchestra much and I love the sound of the 895EN. However, that horn (after two trial periods) had too tight of a blow and felt a touch nose heavy. Maybe the valve and a tight large bore blow would feel more like a balanced medium despite the .547 size? How would you describe the blow? Dry and Smoky are cool with me I can very much work with that.
The 825 has a sterling silver leadpipe as well, correct? Seems to be very Alessi Model based.
In the US, I am going to spend some time with the 882OD and GOR end of this month. I played the 882GOR last December and I thought it sounded exactly like a Stephens Trombone I trialed…def not boring.
The 825 indeed has sterling silver leadpipe. I am not sure about the influence, but maybe it played some part.
Thank you for the very interesting videos! It also helps rfresh my JapaneseDoldom wrote: Sun Oct 19, 2025 9:44 am I have 823G. (Not GD). It is indeed very lightweight and easy blowing, and have a more "BBAM" sound rather than "BUUH" sound,, if that makes sense..? More "ah" sound rather than "uhh" sound. I think it is very similar to 88H thin bell version. Very nimble and more electric brilliance(if that makes sense) at high dynamics, but not necessarily have thick body of sound that helps projection.
I also have 882, and definetely 882 has more body to the sound and volume limit is higher than 823.
But I think I like the 823 a lot for light orchestral repertoire or for first parts of orchestra. I think I can use it well in orchestras except heavy repertoire like Shostakovich,Mahler, Wagner, etc..
I even have the leadpipe pulled out and using some nickel silver or sterling silver aftermarket leadpipe. It helps a little more heaviness and more projection to the sound. But I think a little bit of the characteristic sound(a little blooming after the "BBAM") is lost during the process(I can't describe well with words,,)
These two videos may be helpful.
I can mostly agree with what he says with 823G and 882(although he is saying with 882V).
He also describes 823G sound as "BBAM".
823G sound.
882V sound.
GD(cut-bell version) may be different. Maybe GD version have a little more slotting and projection.

I have always wanted to try the 882V, but it is rare even in Japan, and since it is only available second-hand now I might never have a chance to try it at all...
I have not had a chance to try 823G vs 823GD, but I have tried all the versions of the 835 bass (835/D/G/GD) almost back-to-back. The D versions has more resistance and indeed firmer slot than the respective non-cut versions. Some halo in the sound is lost, but compensated with a more aggressive core, which I prefer.
Chaichan Wiriyaswat
Bangkok, Thailand
Bangkok, Thailand
- WilliamLang
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:12 pm
Re: Some JDM Yamaha large tenors brief review
I loved the 882GOR when I last tried it. It was a close runner-up to the Stephens Horn I ended up with, on par with the Thein Universal 1 I played and miles ahead of anything else at ITF for me. the 882V that I was playing on then was still a little ahead of the GOR to me, and was a fantastic horn, just didn't end up feeling like "home" compared to the Stephens.
William Lang
Faculty, Manhattan School of Music
Faculty, the Longy School of Music
Artist, Long Island Brass and Stephens Horns
founding member of loadbang
www.williamlang.org
Faculty, Manhattan School of Music
Faculty, the Longy School of Music
Artist, Long Island Brass and Stephens Horns
founding member of loadbang
www.williamlang.org
- SwissTbone
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 11:40 pm
- Contact:
Re: Some JDM Yamaha large tenors brief review
That's quite a statement for "large scale" production trombone. Now I need to try one!WilliamLang wrote: Sun Oct 19, 2025 7:08 pm I loved the 882GOR when I last tried it. It was a close runner-up to the Stephens Horn I ended up with, on par with the Thein Universal 1
ƒƒ---------------------------------------------------ƒƒ
Like trombones? Head over to https://swisstbone.com/ to see some great vintage and custom horns!
Like trombones? Head over to https://swisstbone.com/ to see some great vintage and custom horns!
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
- Location: LA
- Contact:
Re: Some JDM Yamaha large tenors brief review
I've played an OR that was one of the worst large tenors I can remember. So they have a fair amount of variance
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
- WilliamLang
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:12 pm
Re: Some JDM Yamaha large tenors brief review
Fwiw I could've stand the OR model. The gold bell G option was a huge difference for me personally.
William Lang
Faculty, Manhattan School of Music
Faculty, the Longy School of Music
Artist, Long Island Brass and Stephens Horns
founding member of loadbang
www.williamlang.org
Faculty, Manhattan School of Music
Faculty, the Longy School of Music
Artist, Long Island Brass and Stephens Horns
founding member of loadbang
www.williamlang.org