LI Brass Sprott

[Druidman]

Has anybody played these pieces? I'm wondering how different they play from the standard series, especially with the tighter throats.

Thanks!

[LIBrassCo]

That's a good question, are you currently on a standard? I'd say the Sprott probably has similar dexterity, with a little more brilliance and color in the sound. It's really going to depend on the player and the shank choice though.

[JeffBone44]

I have an Eon 600, how do they compare to that one?

[LIBrassCo]

I have an Eon 600, how do they compare to that one?

The Eon internal profile is going to have a much more robust sound than a standard series, and shares some DNA with the Sprott profile. Generally I fit someone to one of these lines based on a few factors, the first being ease of access to the full range of the instrument. If a player is finding access to the high range, or response to be an issue on an Eon, I may move to a Sprott and see if the additional compression the tighter throat provides has a positive impact. I would certainly also have them try the Chimera and Standard series tops to see how it works for them. The same process is used for fitting the appropriate shank. It's not uncommon to have more than one shank/top configuration that will get the job done. At that point we would go back and forth a little to see which makes more sense.

In total we have 6, soon to be 7 tenor trombone cup profiles. I regularly work with customers to find which design it's likely their best option, and while it's certainly easier in person, I can do a pretty good job with the detective work even over an internet connection.

[Druidman]

Not to get too off topic, but how would you say the flexibility is between your son and standard series? I'm pretty sure I'll be picking up a sprott when I can.

[LIBrassCo]

Not to get too off topic, but how would you say the flexibility is between your son and standard series? I'm pretty sure I'll be picking up a sprott when I can.

The Sprotts are a great choice! They are unique with the specs they put together, and what those do for player vs anything else in my line. I try to make that true for everything I offer, where it serves a specific role for a group players that can benefit from it.

Again, it's going to be subjective to a specific player. Some (many) players have no issues with flexibility on an Eon, while there are some that will find the standard does a better job for them.

[JeffBone44]

I have an Eon 600, how do they compare to that one?

The Eon internal profile is going to have a much more robust sound than a standard series, and shares some DNA with the Sprott profile. Generally I fit someone to one of these lines based on a few factors, the first being ease of access to the full range of the instrument. If a player is finding access to the high range, or response to be an issue on an Eon, I may move to a Sprott and see if the additional compression the tighter throat provides has a positive impact. I would certainly also have them try the Chimera and Standard series tops to see how it works for them. The same process is used for fitting the appropriate shank. It's not uncommon to have more than one shank/top configuration that will get the job done. At that point we would go back and forth a little to see which makes more sense.

In total we have 6, soon to be 7 tenor trombone cup profiles. I regularly work with customers to find which design it's likely their best option, and while it's certainly easier in person, I can do a pretty good job with the detective work even over an internet connection.

I have no issue with the Eon 600 in the high register. Actually, it feels a little tight down low for me. I probably would have been better off getting the Eon 650. My embouchure requires a large rim size. Would the 650 have a similar cup and throat compared to the 600?

[LIBrassCo]

The Eon internal profile is going to have a much more robust sound than a standard series, and shares some DNA with the Sprott profile. Generally I fit someone to one of these lines based on a few factors, the first being ease of access to the full range of the instrument. If a player is finding access to the high range, or response to be an issue on an Eon, I may move to a Sprott and see if the additional compression the tighter throat provides has a positive impact. I would certainly also have them try the Chimera and Standard series tops to see how it works for them. The same process is used for fitting the appropriate shank. It's not uncommon to have more than one shank/top configuration that will get the job done. At that point we would go back and forth a little to see which makes more sense.

In total we have 6, soon to be 7 tenor trombone cup profiles. I regularly work with customers to find which design it's likely their best option, and while it's certainly easier in person, I can do a pretty good job with the detective work even over an internet connection.

I have no issue with the Eon 600 in the high register. Actually, it feels a little tight down low for me. I probably would have been better off getting the Eon 650. My embouchure requires a large rim size. Would the 650 have a similar cup and throat compared to the 600?

What shank are you using? If you're on a T2 then it's possible a 650 would make more sense. If not, definitely size up the shank first.

[JeffBone44]

Yes, it's the 600 with a T2 shank

[LIBrassCo]

Yes, it's the 600 with a T2 shank

Ya, the next logical step would be an Eon 650 top, or if you want to keep the rim size maybe look at the 600 in the Euphonium line.

[JeffBone44]

Yes, it's the 600 with a T2 shank

Ya, the next logical step would be an Eon 650 top, or if you want to keep the rim size maybe look at the 600 in the Euphonium line.

I was playing more this weekend, and the 600 was working better down low when I didn’t push the air as hard. Relaxation is key, and I need to just let the mouthpiece and horn do the work for me. I love the robust tone that I get with it.