angel eyes missing part

Post Reply
mikerspencer
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2022 2:45 am
Location: Lothians, Scotland

angel eyes missing part

Post by mikerspencer »

Hi all,

My big band is missing a second trombone part for angel eyes, arranged by Fedchock. Is anyone able to share a scan?

Cheers! Mike
CBlair
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:02 pm

Re: angel eyes missing part

Post by CBlair »

John Fedchock would appreciate you purchasing a replacement of his work, as provided under U.S copyright law.
mikerspencer
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2022 2:45 am
Location: Lothians, Scotland

Re: angel eyes missing part

Post by mikerspencer »

CBlair wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 9:58 am John Fedchock would appreciate you purchasing a replacement of his work, as provided under U.S copyright law.
That's a great idea, do you know if/where individual parts are available?
User avatar
harrisonreed
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:18 pm
Location: Fort Riley, Kansas
Contact:

Re: angel eyes missing part

Post by harrisonreed »

You can at least see what the notes for the part are in the score, right?
User avatar
Doug Elliott
Posts: 3528
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:12 pm
Location: Maryand

Re: angel eyes missing part

Post by Doug Elliott »

Send John a message on Facebook
"I know a thing or two because I've seen a thing or two."
Dennis
Posts: 333
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 6:23 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Re: angel eyes missing part

Post by Dennis »

CBlair wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 9:58 am John Fedchock would appreciate you purchasing a replacement of his work, as provided under U.S copyright law.
While some publishers (notably Sierra Music) make individual parts available for purchase, ejazzlines (Fedchock's primary publisher) does not. Beyond that, the piece requested (Angel Eyes) appears to be out of print. (JW Pepper's site suggests this, and it's not listed at ejazzlines.)

So it appears that OP's choices are:
1. Remove the piece from the program.
2. Violate copyright by copying the part out from the score.
3. Violate copyright by obtaining a copy from elsewhere.

Even if the piece was in print and ejazzlines did provide replacement parts, I'd be surprised if Fedchock saw anything on his next royalty check. In matters of copyright, my sympathies lie with the creators rather than the publishers. Note also that if the OP chose option 1, Fedchock would lose some money from his performance rights royalty check.
User avatar
harrisonreed
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:18 pm
Location: Fort Riley, Kansas
Contact:

Re: angel eyes missing part

Post by harrisonreed »

I mean, for no. 1, you're assuming the venue is paying out to ASCAP to begin with. But reading from the score does not violate copyright.
User avatar
JohnL
Posts: 1970
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:01 am
Contact:

Re: angel eyes missing part

Post by JohnL »

According to Stanton's, the publisher is (was) Kendor Music. Searching Kendor's site for "Angel Eyes" comes up blank, and it's not listed under John Fedchock's name.

The pretty much leaves you to contact John Fedchock directly if you want to stay clean from a copyright standpoint.
boneapart
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:57 pm

Re: angel eyes missing part

Post by boneapart »

Sent you a private message about acquiring the part.
mikerspencer
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2022 2:45 am
Location: Lothians, Scotland

Re: angel eyes missing part

Post by mikerspencer »

Thanks all, I emailed John about purchasing the part. He's replied and is hopeful he'll be able to sort something out.
Post Reply

Return to “Composition, Arrangement, & Theory”