Lightweight & responsive valves
- BrianJohnston
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 7:49 pm
- Location: North America
- Contact:
Lightweight & responsive valves
I apologize in advance if there’s already a thread like this one out there, but I’m interested in learning about the lightest weight valves on the market right now. I’ve heard about the Icon valve, I know shires axials are lightweight? And Matthew Walker’s M&W valve I’ve only heard absolutely great things about.
So, what are some of the best lightweight valves available in late 2024, and how do the blows compare to the open horn? Thanks
So, what are some of the best lightweight valves available in late 2024, and how do the blows compare to the open horn? Thanks
Fort Wayne Philharmonic
Lima Symphony Orchestra
Lima Symphony Orchestra
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 5144
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
- Location: LA
- Contact:
Re: Lightweight & responsive valves
Shires axials are not lightweight. M&W valves are great but they are not light either. Icon is definitely a contender.
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
- BrianJohnston
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 7:49 pm
- Location: North America
- Contact:
Re: Lightweight & responsive valves
Do you know any additional valves that would be similar to the Icon?
Fort Wayne Philharmonic
Lima Symphony Orchestra
Lima Symphony Orchestra
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 5144
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
- Location: LA
- Contact:
Re: Lightweight & responsive valves
Laetzsch carbon valves
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
-
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 12:55 am
- Location: Austria
Re: Lightweight & responsive valves
The Laetzsch is outstanding!!
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2018 7:10 am
Re: Lightweight & responsive valves
Meinlschmidt Open Flow.
Not necessarily the lightest, but definitely not heavy.
Not necessarily the lightest, but definitely not heavy.
Gaudet bass
Adams TB1 Open Flow dual bore tenor
Martin Urbie Green
Adams TB1 Open Flow dual bore tenor
Martin Urbie Green
- BrianJohnston
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 7:49 pm
- Location: North America
- Contact:
Re: Lightweight & responsive valves
So far I’m interested in the Icon, and the Latzsch Carbon. Anyone have an idea which of the two would be lighter, with or without including the wrap? Also would the Caidex be a contender with those two?
Fort Wayne Philharmonic
Lima Symphony Orchestra
Lima Symphony Orchestra
-
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Wed May 02, 2018 9:20 pm
Re: Lightweight & responsive valves
Understand that "weight", on every part of the instrument, has a BIG influence on how the instrument performs. Some manufacturers take that impact into consideration in the design phase. Simply reducing weight may not provide the result you think it will
Matthew Walker
Owner/Craftsman, M&W Custom Trombones, LLC, Jackson, Wisconsin.
Former Bass Trombonist, Opera Australia, 1991-2006
Owner/Craftsman, M&W Custom Trombones, LLC, Jackson, Wisconsin.
Former Bass Trombonist, Opera Australia, 1991-2006
- UATrombone
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2024 12:10 pm
Re: Lightweight & responsive valves
Lightest and very responsive valve in the whole world is NoValve...
Many manufacturers offer this type of thing.
Many manufacturers offer this type of thing.
-
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:20 am
- Location: Boston, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Lightweight & responsive valves
The Caidex valve is quite lightweight. Steve Shires' new valve is similarly light, and his way of bracing the valve section and bell manages to combine lightness with stability and solid core to the sound.
Gabe Rice
Faculty
Boston University School of Music
Kinhaven Music School Senior Session
Bass Trombonist
Rhode Island Philharmonic Orchestra
Vermont Symphony Orchestra
Faculty
Boston University School of Music
Kinhaven Music School Senior Session
Bass Trombonist
Rhode Island Philharmonic Orchestra
Vermont Symphony Orchestra
- BrianJohnston
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 7:49 pm
- Location: North America
- Contact:
Re: Lightweight & responsive valves
So the valve on the Stephens trombone?GabrielRice wrote: ↑Thu Nov 07, 2024 6:21 am The Caidex valve is quite lightweight. Steve Shires' new valve is similarly light, and his way of bracing the valve section and bell manages to combine lightness with stability and solid core to the sound.
Fort Wayne Philharmonic
Lima Symphony Orchestra
Lima Symphony Orchestra
-
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:20 am
- Location: Boston, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Lightweight & responsive valves
Yes
Gabe Rice
Faculty
Boston University School of Music
Kinhaven Music School Senior Session
Bass Trombonist
Rhode Island Philharmonic Orchestra
Vermont Symphony Orchestra
Faculty
Boston University School of Music
Kinhaven Music School Senior Session
Bass Trombonist
Rhode Island Philharmonic Orchestra
Vermont Symphony Orchestra
-
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 10:52 am
Re: Lightweight & responsive valves
Brian,
Always keep in mind the sound concept that you are aiming for. The trend over the last 10-15 years has been to go lighter and lighter, but there have been sacrifices. Lighter instruments and components usually translate to less core in the sound and less projection. I believe you are the Principal Trombonist in an orchestra. A lighter instrument might result in less projection and sound density......is that the sound that you are aiming for?
I am a retired band and orchestra director. I keep busy by playing a few gigs a month, teaching lessons, building horns in my shop, directing a college wind ensemble and directing a semi-professional brass band. To fill my hours of void, I work 25+ hours a week in a repair shop that sees oodles of instruments come through, from student to top-notch professional.
I believe that giving examples is the best way to illustrate a point. Last week, we saw a Finke single B-flat horn with a stop-horn valve that could be quickly switched to an F-valve come through for a cleaning and some small dents removed. It was made with the carbon (graphite) rotary valves that everyone seems to be fascinated with. This horn was a custom build and had a large bell throat, so it was designed to blend with the standard double horns. The instrument was a built in the mid-1990s and it was a work of art. Naturally, the horn players in our shop (we have a couple of good players) found it fascinating and wanted to play test this beautiful instrument. They were very impressed with it and marveled at how light it felt and its quick response. They thought the action of the carbon valves was impressively quick and the sound was huge.
However, I was sitting on the other side of the shop (maybe 25-30 yards away) and I was hearing something different. I thought the sound was thin and favored a lot of the high overtones. I brought it to their attention and the horn players both listened to each other from a farther distance away. They agreed that the horn sounded different from a distance and lacked projection. They both noted that this instrument would be devoured by a full orchestra and it was better suited for a chamber group like a woodwind quintet.
I appreciate your pursuit of the ultimate trombone equipment! I think it is good to realize that it is easy to go too far in a particular direction. Yes, gains can be made (lightweight to hold, quick response), but losses can happen as well (loss of projection/density). Just be careful with your projects and always ask for input/feedback from musician friends you trust. Good luck and please update us with whatever you do.....I enjoy your posts!
Always keep in mind the sound concept that you are aiming for. The trend over the last 10-15 years has been to go lighter and lighter, but there have been sacrifices. Lighter instruments and components usually translate to less core in the sound and less projection. I believe you are the Principal Trombonist in an orchestra. A lighter instrument might result in less projection and sound density......is that the sound that you are aiming for?
I am a retired band and orchestra director. I keep busy by playing a few gigs a month, teaching lessons, building horns in my shop, directing a college wind ensemble and directing a semi-professional brass band. To fill my hours of void, I work 25+ hours a week in a repair shop that sees oodles of instruments come through, from student to top-notch professional.
I believe that giving examples is the best way to illustrate a point. Last week, we saw a Finke single B-flat horn with a stop-horn valve that could be quickly switched to an F-valve come through for a cleaning and some small dents removed. It was made with the carbon (graphite) rotary valves that everyone seems to be fascinated with. This horn was a custom build and had a large bell throat, so it was designed to blend with the standard double horns. The instrument was a built in the mid-1990s and it was a work of art. Naturally, the horn players in our shop (we have a couple of good players) found it fascinating and wanted to play test this beautiful instrument. They were very impressed with it and marveled at how light it felt and its quick response. They thought the action of the carbon valves was impressively quick and the sound was huge.
However, I was sitting on the other side of the shop (maybe 25-30 yards away) and I was hearing something different. I thought the sound was thin and favored a lot of the high overtones. I brought it to their attention and the horn players both listened to each other from a farther distance away. They agreed that the horn sounded different from a distance and lacked projection. They both noted that this instrument would be devoured by a full orchestra and it was better suited for a chamber group like a woodwind quintet.
I appreciate your pursuit of the ultimate trombone equipment! I think it is good to realize that it is easy to go too far in a particular direction. Yes, gains can be made (lightweight to hold, quick response), but losses can happen as well (loss of projection/density). Just be careful with your projects and always ask for input/feedback from musician friends you trust. Good luck and please update us with whatever you do.....I enjoy your posts!
Brian D. Hinkley - Player, Teacher, Technician and Trombone Enthusiast
- BrianJohnston
- Posts: 752
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 7:49 pm
- Location: North America
- Contact:
Re: Lightweight & responsive valves
This is all to be tested, not to be bought in replacement to my current set up. Appreciate your concern and advice!Crazy4Tbone86 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 07, 2024 8:52 am Brian,
Always keep in mind the sound concept that you are aiming for. The trend over the last 10-15 years has been to go lighter and lighter, but there have been sacrifices. Lighter instruments and components usually translate to less core in the sound and less projection. I believe you are the Principal Trombonist in an orchestra. A lighter instrument might result in less projection and sound density......is that the sound that you are aiming for?
I am a retired band and orchestra director. I keep busy by playing a few gigs a month, teaching lessons, building horns in my shop, directing a college wind ensemble and directing a semi-professional brass band. To fill my hours of void, I work 25+ hours a week in a repair shop that sees oodles of instruments come through, from student to top-notch professional.
I believe that giving examples is the best way to illustrate a point. Last week, we saw a Finke single B-flat horn with a stop-horn valve that could be quickly switched to an F-valve come through for a cleaning and some small dents removed. It was made with the carbon (graphite) rotary valves that everyone seems to be fascinated with. This horn was a custom build and had a large bell throat, so it was designed to blend with the standard double horns. The instrument was a built in the mid-1990s and it was a work of art. Naturally, the horn players in our shop (we have a couple of good players) found it fascinating and wanted to play test this beautiful instrument. They were very impressed with it and marveled at how light it felt and its quick response. They thought the action of the carbon valves was impressively quick and the sound was huge.
However, I was sitting on the other side of the shop (maybe 25-30 yards away) and I was hearing something different. I thought the sound was thin and favored a lot of the high overtones. I brought it to their attention and the horn players both listened to each other from a farther distance away. They agreed that the horn sounded different from a distance and lacked projection. They both noted that this instrument would be devoured by a full orchestra and it was better suited for a chamber group like a woodwind quintet.
I appreciate your pursuit of the ultimate trombone equipment! I think it is good to realize that it is easy to go too far in a particular direction. Yes, gains can be made (lightweight to hold, quick response), but losses can happen as well (loss of projection/density). Just be careful with your projects and always ask for input/feedback from musician friends you trust. Good luck and please update us with whatever you do.....I enjoy your posts!
Fort Wayne Philharmonic
Lima Symphony Orchestra
Lima Symphony Orchestra