Different mpc metals and their affect on spund/play

Post Reply
Thrawn22
Posts: 1278
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 10:18 pm

Different mpc metals and their affect on spund/play

Post by Thrawn22 »

I'm really digging my Symington 1.5. So much so i want to get a second as a backup mouthpiece. I know he uses different metals/alloys for those who may have allergies or want something different. Does the change in metals affect the sound? I imagine it affects the feel. Thoughts?


Thanks
6H (K series)
6H (early 60s)
4H/5H custom bell
78H ('53)
78H (K series)
78H/36BG /2547 slide
8H
88HN
71H (dependant valves)
72H
35H alto (K series)
WGWTR180
Posts: 1211
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:32 pm

Re: Different mpc metals and their affect on spund/play

Post by WGWTR180 »

yes it does. I have one. pm me.
FOSSIL
Posts: 685
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 8:41 am

Re: Different mpc metals and their affect on spund/play

Post by FOSSIL »

Oh yes, as Bill said, there's a difference.

Chris
User avatar
hyperbolica
Posts: 2790
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:31 am

Re: Different mpc metals and their affect on spund/play

Post by hyperbolica »

I use DE mouthpieces, and for the most part I don't notice a difference between lexan and brass rims. But I do notice a difference when I put (a different maker's) stainless rim on.

It's hard to make a real comparison when you swap out the entire mouthpiece, but just switching the rim makes it clear which component affected the change. The stainless (harder, more dense, stiffer) makes for a brighter sound. Not sure how that relates to your mouthpiece, but yes, the material does matter.
User avatar
ithinknot
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2020 3:40 pm

Re: Different mpc metals and their affect on spund/play

Post by ithinknot »

Changing material/density is the only way you can change mass while maintaining the same relative mass distribution (i.e. blank shape)... so it's a bit like the usual standard vs heavyweight characteristics, but also not...

hyperbolica wrote: Sun Jun 13, 2021 3:14 pm It's hard to make a real comparison when you swap out the entire mouthpiece, but just switching the rim makes it clear which component affected the change. The stainless (harder, more dense, stiffer) makes for a brighter sound.
When it's just the rim, I wonder if it sounds much different to the listener, or whether the difference is mostly an intracranial perception thing caused by the different feedback/vibration coupling characteristics of the material :idk:
WGWTR180
Posts: 1211
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:32 pm

Re: Different mpc metals and their affect on spund/play

Post by WGWTR180 »

hyperbolica wrote: Sun Jun 13, 2021 3:14 pm I use DE mouthpieces, and for the most part I don't notice a difference between lexan and brass rims. But I do notice a difference when I put (a different maker's) stainless rim on.

It's hard to make a real comparison when you swap out the entire mouthpiece, but just switching the rim makes it clear which component affected the change. The stainless (harder, more dense, stiffer) makes for a brighter sound. Not sure how that relates to your mouthpiece, but yes, the material does matter.
I believe that has more to do with weight than anything.
LIBrassCo
Posts: 428
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:34 am
Location: Long Island, NY
Contact:

Re: Different mpc metals and their affect on spund/play

Post by LIBrassCo »

The metal a mouthpiece is made of absolutely adjusts your sound, but it does much more than that. The response and tactile feel on your chops also vary significantly. I've played the same exact mouthpiece in brass, bronze, wood, and titanium. All 4 are 2 piece, allowing me to switch out the shank material as well, of which I have tried brass, bronze, titanium. Nickel silver, and carbon fiber.

In a nutshell, using brass as a baseline, bronze responds faster, is brighter, but the sound is also richer (overtones really shine through). Hard articulations come out easily, and legato playing is similar to brass, perhaps requiring some additional finesse.

Titanium responds faster than bronze, has an incredible slippery feel on the chops (when brought to a super fine polish), but the sound is kind of dead compared to the other materials. I find additional work is needed for hard accents, and legato playing is smooth as silk.

I find that due to the properties of both these metals. They both benefit from being paired in some way (bronze shank with titanium top, or the opposite as works as well).

I won't run through every material I've played, but thought these examples would illustrate what impact materials make well enough.
Check out our new bass trombone doubling mouthpieces: https://www.librassco.com/broadway-bass
WGWTR180
Posts: 1211
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:32 pm

Re: Different mpc metals and their affect on spund/play

Post by WGWTR180 »

Zirconium.
btone
Posts: 126
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 8:14 am
Location: MS
Contact:

Re: Different mpc metals and their affect on spund/play

Post by btone »

When I asked Bill about the difference with his zirconium he said that to him it seemed to have a warmer sound. He also said that it has more overtones and that it might be accurate to say that it can amplify one's tendency toward bright or dark. He also said it responds more easily at soft volumes.
Elow
Posts: 1791
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 6:18 am

Re: Different mpc metals and their affect on spund/play

Post by Elow »

btone wrote: Sun Jun 27, 2021 8:24 am He also said it responds more easily at soft volumes.
That’s the biggest difference that i felt when i was deciding on which to keep. I’m sure there were more audible differences that i would’ve noticed if i recorded myself
User avatar
dershem
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 7:24 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Different mpc metals and their affect on spund/play

Post by dershem »

LIBrassCo wrote: Mon Jun 21, 2021 5:03 am The metal a mouthpiece is made of absolutely adjusts your sound, but it does much more than that. The response and tactile feel on your chops also vary significantly. I've played the same exact mouthpiece in brass, bronze, wood, and titanium. All 4 are 2 piece, allowing me to switch out the shank material as well, of which I have tried brass, bronze, titanium. Nickel silver, and carbon fiber.

In a nutshell, using brass as a baseline, bronze responds faster, is brighter, but the sound is also richer (overtones really shine through). Hard articulations come out easily, and legato playing is similar to brass, perhaps requiring some additional finesse.

Titanium responds faster than bronze, has an incredible slippery feel on the chops (when brought to a super fine polish), but the sound is kind of dead compared to the other materials. I find additional work is needed for hard accents, and legato playing is smooth as silk.

I find that due to the properties of both these metals. They both benefit from being paired in some way (bronze shank with titanium top, or the opposite as works as well).

I won't run through every material I've played, but thought these examples would illustrate what impact materials make well enough.
A nice table, or a complete entry/diary/posting might be very interesting and informative.

I, for one, am somewhat disappointed that the experiments with Aluminum didn't work out better. Having an aluminum mouthpiece was very handy when I lived in a cold climate.
WGWTR180
Posts: 1211
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:32 pm

Re: Different mpc metals and their affect on spund/play

Post by WGWTR180 »

btone wrote: Sun Jun 27, 2021 8:24 am When I asked Bill about the difference with his zirconium he said that to him it seemed to have a warmer sound. He also said that it has more overtones and that it might be accurate to say that it can amplify one's tendency toward bright or dark. He also said it responds more easily at soft volumes.
Completely agree!
Post Reply

Return to “Mouthpieces”