Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post Reply
User avatar
although
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:02 am

Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by although »

So, I've been playing my 1952 Conn 6H in the community band (on and off as the pandemic allowed) for over a year now. When I bought it, there was no counterweight. It felt super alien to me with all that weight up front (this is not a light slide model). I immediately bought a counterweight for it, and it's been a great player for me.

But, I was doing some practicing this evening and a thought occurred. How much difference does the counterweight make in the sound? So, I took it off...

I mean, maybe it's just because I expected a difference, but I swear the old horn suddenly became just a little more lively! Granted, the super nose heaviness is going to take some getting used to. But, I think I'm going to give it a month or three and see how it goes. It's noticably lighter overall now, and I rather like the spartan look...

Has anyone experimented with/without counterweights? Have you guys run across any writings on the subject?

Cheers!

mike
jorymil
Posts: 256
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:23 pm
Location: Kansas City

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by jorymil »

Ergonomically I just can't deal with a nose-heavy horn: I get wrist pain. Perhaps if I stood and stooped, it'd be better, but if I'm sitting, I've got to have a counterweight or two.
User avatar
Burgerbob
Posts: 4530
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
Location: LA
Contact:

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by Burgerbob »

I tried my Elkhart 6H without a counterweight a couple times. I can't do it, my wrist gets super messed up very quickly. I also don't like how it changes the louder response.
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
User avatar
although
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:02 am

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by although »

Honestly, I'm finding that my left hand hasn't got a lot to do without the counterweight. It's holding the horn against my face, but the right hand feels like it's carrying most of the weight. It's strange feeling for sure!

I just weighed that counterweight, it's 201g... Heck, the slide weighs 255g.
Kevbach33
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 10:00 pm

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by Kevbach33 »

No counterweight on my 50s 6H is a no-fly zone for me. Not with the 8" bell and heavy slide. It's just too heavy up front.

It might be more doable with a lightweight slide or one of the older, smaller bell examples.
Kevin Afflerbach
'57 Conn 6H, Warburton 9M/9D/T3★
'62 Holton 168, Bach 5GL
Getzen 1052FD Eterna, Pickett 1.5S
F. Schmidt 2103 BBb Tuba, Laskey 30G
Wessex Tubas TE360P Bombino
John Packer JP274MKII Euphonium, Robert Tucci RT-7C
whitbey
Posts: 607
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:44 am
Location: Rochester Michigan North of Detroit.
Contact:

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by whitbey »

Edwards has the TURD. It is a weight with a thin rod or wire connection.
I am thinking of finding some brass statue and mounting it with a couple thin wires.
The Edwards counter weight is 6 oz. To balance on the brace of the straight neck pipe it needs to be 3 or 4 times heavier. So I don't think the TURD is heavy enough.
Looking on Ebay for a Eagle or something that is brass has enough mass.
I found the horn played better when I slid the weight away from the bell to the neckpipe side. So about anything is going to affect it.
Edwards Sterling bell 525/547
Edwards brass bell 547/562
Edwards Jazz w/ Ab valve 500"/.508"
Markus Leuchter Alto Trombone
Bass Bach 50 Bb/F/C dependent.
Cerveny oval euphonium
Full list in profile
Thrawn22
Posts: 1278
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 10:18 pm

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by Thrawn22 »

6Hs do better with the counterweight imo. I have a few from various years and they just balance and play better with the weight on. Same goes for the slide weight. I've tried a 100H and 5H slide on 6H bells and they lose focus.
6H (K series)
6H (early 60s)
4H/5H custom bell
78H ('53)
78H (K series)
78H/36BG /2547 slide
8H
88HN
71H (dependant valves)
72H
35H alto (K series)
CalgaryTbone
Posts: 1049
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 1:39 pm

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by CalgaryTbone »

When I was a student, there were still a lot of trombone players playing straight horns without a counter weight. The idea was exactly what the OP said - a more vibrant feeling when playing. I tried it, but like so many folks have said, it can really mess with your wrist and arm. Long term - I think it could really cause a tendonitis issue. The Edwards weight that was suggested might be a good solution - Christan designed it to have very little contact surface with the horn to minimize any dampening of vibrations. The Trombolizer that Joe Alessi has endorsed might be good too, but they are quite expensive.

A lot of people like a counterweight, not just because of balance, but it can also add a bit of a "solid" feel to the horn. With or without, there's probably a small difference - either a bit more flexible or a bit better core and "lock" on notes. Either way, it's not a huge difference.

Jim Scott
User avatar
harrisonreed
Posts: 4494
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:18 pm
Location: Fort Riley, Kansas
Contact:

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by harrisonreed »

The difference just the harmonic brace screws make in the 396 is insane. A full counterweight is even moreso, and it's all or nothing with one.

I wonder if you just hang the weight from a string if you can minimize the effect the weight has but balance the horn. Or like that one guy with the weight on a stick out behind the horn.
Bach5G
Posts: 2270
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:10 pm

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by Bach5G »

I once tried horns at Shires and found a difference between solid and hollow core bracing on the tuning slide.
User avatar
although
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:02 am

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by although »

So, it's been a few weeks. I'm still playing the old 6H without any counterweight. Honestly, I think I'm going to leave it that way. The whole horn is lighter, I like the way it's sounding...

Who says a horn has to balance on your left hand anyway? It seems to me that most other instruments don't have this special requirement. My left hand is more comfortable with things now, and my right isn't particularly bothered with the extra few ounces of weight.

It's official, I'm calling it now. The weight stays off this horn. I reserve the right to change my mind at a later date though.

Cheers! mike
User avatar
dukesboneman
Posts: 636
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 4:40 pm
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Contact:

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by dukesboneman »

It doesn`t always have to be a Conn Counter weight.
If you know anyone with a Bach or an older 3 piece King, try that.
I seem to remember that the older Conn "Marching Men" weight was a little heavier than the more modern "Conn" one.
The XO Counter weight from the Fedchock model can`t be too heavy, because one of the selling points is that the horn is super light.
User avatar
Matt K
Verified
Posts: 3945
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by Matt K »

Im not convinced clamping the counterweight is the best approach to be honest. I had a Yamaha tuning slide that I added some OE Thayer hardware but I only had a decorative counterweight added to it. I was intending to make more in varying weights. Depending on how I go with my small bore setup I might experiment with whatever I end up settling on. Probably a king 3BF. I like the idea of the harmonic pillars but I really like counterweights so trying to figure out some combination that maybe does best of both worlds
User avatar
hyperbolica
Posts: 2792
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:31 am

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by hyperbolica »

I have an Olds Recording that I got without a counterweight, but the horn is heavy as it is, and with that extra torque on my wrist, I just felt better with a weight on it. Recording counterweights actually bring some money, being fairly rare, and the brace is bigger than most, so you'd have to drill out any other kind of weight.

So what I did was to steal a solder-on weight from an old Ambassador and put it on the Recording. It solders directly to the inside of the tuning bow. I haven't done any sound tests with/without the weight, but it sure does feel better, and getting it further back on the horn allows it to be a little lighter.

You could also go the Rath route. Skip the silly R, and just solder on a chunk of brass. Or melt down some old lead pipes or fishing weights on the kitchen stove and make your own!
Clipboard01.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Matt K
Verified
Posts: 3945
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by Matt K »

I definitely don’t want it to be soldered. I like the Rath weight and if they were less than like $300 I might buy one to modify :lol:

Maybe I’ll dig up the pictures later. I like the threaded mounting hardware because it’s pretty easily removable while still looking aesthetic
User avatar
hyperbolica
Posts: 2792
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:31 am

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by hyperbolica »

Matt K wrote: Wed Jun 08, 2022 12:28 pm ...I like the threaded mounting hardware because it’s pretty easily removable while still looking aesthetic
The threaded connections are still soldered...
Clipboard01.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
pbone3b
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 7:44 pm
Location: New York, NY
Contact:

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by pbone3b »

Here's a counterweight Josh Landress made for me. (Shown on a 3b) I told him that I like the feel of half a Bach counterweight. He made a back out of aluminum (negligible weight) and attached it with what I believe to be ligature screws.

The blue tape is painter's tape.

I tend to move it around, take it off, put it back on, and drive myself crazy. Lately, it's almost like ankle weights, I get used to the lessened response, and then I enjoy taking it off. Head games.

IMG_0595.png
IMG_0596.png
IMG_0597.png
IMG_0598.png
IMG_0599.png
IMG_0600.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"You blow in this end of the trombone,
and sound comes out the other end and
disrupts the cosmos."
Roswell Rudd

Check out Pat's music
http://pbone.org
User avatar
Matt K
Verified
Posts: 3945
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Counterweight on a 6H, I'm gonna try going without it

Post by Matt K »

hyperbolica wrote: Wed Jun 08, 2022 12:37 pm
Matt K wrote: Wed Jun 08, 2022 12:28 pm ...I like the threaded mounting hardware because it’s pretty easily removable while still looking aesthetic
The threaded connections are still soldered...

Clipboard01.jpg
I meant the weight itself, but it looks like on that one you can remove it? I don't recall having owned an Olds with that particular configuration counterweight.
pbone3b wrote: Wed Jun 08, 2022 1:25 pm Here's a counterweight Josh Landress made for me. (Shown on a 3b) I told him that I like the feel of half a Bach counterweight. He made a back out of aluminum (negligible weight) and attached it with what I believe to be ligature screws.

The blue tape is painter's tape.

I tend to move it around, take it off, put it back on, and drive myself crazy. Lately, it's almost like ankle weights, I get used to the lessened response, and then I enjoy taking it off. Head games.
That's a pretty nifty weight. That's kind of the idea I have in mind although what I'm goign to do is solder the weight(s) to the crossbrace but they'll be removable so they don't have to screw in. I'm also not convinced it will make any improvement but the way the Edwards 396 people talk about it I feel like there must be something to the weight thing.
Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”