Benge 290 question
-
- Posts: 588
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 7:45 am
Benge 290 question
I have to opportunity to buy an unmolested 290 at a reasonable price. But I've never played one and don't know anything about them.
Are the valves dependent or independent? How are they tuned? Is it a good axe for big band work?
Thanks in advance for any insights.
Are the valves dependent or independent? How are they tuned? Is it a good axe for big band work?
Thanks in advance for any insights.
-
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Wed May 02, 2018 9:20 pm
Re: Benge 290 question
Do a Google search for images.
They're a good "all round" horn
They're a good "all round" horn
Matthew Walker
Owner/Craftsman, M&W Custom Trombones, LLC, Jackson, Wisconsin.
Former Bass Trombonist, Opera Australia, 1991-2006
Owner/Craftsman, M&W Custom Trombones, LLC, Jackson, Wisconsin.
Former Bass Trombonist, Opera Australia, 1991-2006
-
- Posts: 588
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2019 7:45 am
Re: Benge 290 question
I know Benge had a close association with King. Do the 290's have the same playing characteristics as the Duo Gravis?hornbuilder wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:36 am Do a Google search for images.
They're a good "all round" horn
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 4649
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
- Location: LA
- Contact:
Re: Benge 290 question
No. Honestly, nothing really plays like a DG.bigbandbone wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 10:13 amI know Benge had a close association with King. Do the 290's have the same playing characteristics as the Duo Gravis?hornbuilder wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:36 am Do a Google search for images.
They're a good "all round" horn
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
- spencercarran
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 1:02 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: Benge 290 question
More like a 7B/8B (somewhere in between the two in size). It's a pretty well regarded horn.
The 290 independent valves with convertible tuning - you can choose Bb/F/Gb/D or Bb/F/G/Eb by removing a spacer in the second valve tuning slide. I played one in big band setting for a while, seemed to work well for that purpose.
The 290 independent valves with convertible tuning - you can choose Bb/F/Gb/D or Bb/F/G/Eb by removing a spacer in the second valve tuning slide. I played one in big band setting for a while, seemed to work well for that purpose.
-
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:10 pm
Re: Benge 290 question
I’m in the process of buying a friend’s 290. I’ve been playing it all summer. My impression is that it plays very easily and has a very quick response. I think it would be excellent for a big band although it might not have the “cut” that some like in that situation. That could depend on the player though. Maybe not the last word in overall sound? (I’m thinking of a Toronto player who nicknamed his Bach bass trombone the “Obliterater.”)
- SlideCrook
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 6:43 pm
Re: Benge 290 question
It can throw some cut with a 1.5g. Or a 2G as long as you don’t tell your friends.
With a bigger piece it can Orch it up, too
If it’s in good shape and a good price, go for it. I always liked the second valve modularity in G vs Gflat.
Benges are sleepers.
With a bigger piece it can Orch it up, too
If it’s in good shape and a good price, go for it. I always liked the second valve modularity in G vs Gflat.
Benges are sleepers.
-
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
- Location: California
Re: Benge 290 question
It's not really that Benge "had an association" with King. The Benge trombones were made by King.bigbandbone wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 10:13 am I know Benge had a close association with King. Do the 290's have the same playing characteristics as the Duo Gravis?
I have pieced together this story based on fragments I have picked up, so it may not be quite accurate.
In 1972, King bought Benge, a Los Angeles-based maker of fine trumpets that was going out of business. In 1985, G.C. Conn purchased King; later that year both were absorbed by a Swedish conglomerate; the resulting company was named United Musical Instruments (UMI), with manufacturing in Eastlake, Ohio. King stopped making Benge trumpets, but retained the brand name they had purchased.
At some point – perhaps in the mid- to late-1980s (possibly urged on by George Szell, conductor of the Cleveland Orchestra) – King wanted to penetrate the “Classical” market, and redesigned their trombones to produce a “more orchestral” sound. The redesign was led by Chuck Ward at King, who started with the existing King 4BF, and developed an improved line of trombones. Initially labeled with the King name, they were not well received, but when renamed “Benge” they were better accepted. Thus – in the late 1980s (?) – the birth of Benge trombones. The first out of the factory was the Benge 190 (0.547” bore with semi-open-wrap F-attachment), followed later by the Benge 170, 175, 165F, and 290.
All the Benge trombones were well made, by King workers in the King Eastlake factory. In 2000, UMI was purchased by Steinway (the owner of Bach-Selmer), and the corporate name changed to Conn-Selmer, who had little use for yet another brand in their brass instrument stable, so abandoned the Benge name and discontinued manufacturing all the Benge trombones.
Though not very successful in the marketplace, and not highly priced these days, many think that Benge trombones are undervalued treasures.
-
- Posts: 1060
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 1:39 pm
Re: Benge 290 question
One small correction - by the time Benge trombones were around George Szell was long gone from Cleveland. The Cleveland section was playing King 5B's (with Anderson playing a 10.5" bell Bach). The Kings were chosen because Szell wanted German trombones, and the section weren't too happy with what they found on that front. The Kings seemed to satisfy Szell as to the sound he was looking for, and the trombonists found them to be more like the other American makes they were used to. Some of the Cleveland players did start playing the Benge trombones when they came out, as did Marcellus and some of the other National Symphony guys. The Benge trombones were quite popular for several years around the late 80's- early 90's. I remember that Jim Pugh had something to do with the small bore Benge design. I've had some students that played Benge horns who sounded quite good on them - nice instruments.
Jim Scott
Jim Scott
-
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
- Location: California
Re: Benge 290 question
Thanks for the clarification Jim. You (and others) surely know this history better than I do. I only got interested in Benge a few years ago when I stumbled on a nicely refurbished Benge 165F, which I enjoyed (pre-pandemic) playing as a backup/alternate to my trusty 1972 Conn 88H. I've seen/heard other nice Benge trombones. Underrated, in my (old-fashioned) view. But I've never seen a Benge 290.CalgaryTbone wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 6:49 pm One small correction - by the time Benge trombones were around George Szell was long gone from Cleveland. The Cleveland section was playing King 5B's ...
I've had some students that played Benge horns who sounded quite good on them - nice instruments.
Jim Scott
- spencercarran
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 1:02 pm
- Location: Chicago
- Burgerbob
- Posts: 4649
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
- Location: LA
- Contact:
Re: Benge 290 question
spencercarran wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 10:01 pmBy far the most common adjective used in relation to Benge, but who exactly is underrating them? Just about everyone who comments on Benge trombones agrees that they're good instruments.
Having some first hand experience with Benge, I'd say they're... rated.
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
-
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:10 pm
Re: Benge 290 question
I’m just guessing but I wonder if Bach bass trombones dominated in US orchestras from the 1960s until the mid 90s when the first Edwards appeared. It wasn’t that the Benges weren’t decent, it was just that they weren’t Bachs.
- spencercarran
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 1:02 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: Benge 290 question
FWIW I would probably choose the Benge 290 over a Bach 50. Not saying the Benge is necessarily "better," just matches my preferences a bit closer. YMMV
- JohnL
- Posts: 1595
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:01 am
- Contact:
Re: Benge 290 question
I'd say more "unheralded" than "underrated". Any school band director has heard of Bach, King, Conn, and Yamaha, whereas Benge trombones were never that well known and become even less so as time passes. As a result, they're often less expensive than the roughly equivalent models from better known brands. Holton is kinda in the same boat as far as trombones.spencercarran wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 10:01 pmBy far the most common adjective used in relation to Benge, but who exactly is underrating them? Just about everyone who comments on Benge trombones agrees that they're good instruments.
Not everyone is enthusiastic about Benge trombones - but then not everyone is enthusiastic about the other brands I mentioned, either.
- LeTromboniste
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:22 am
- Location: Sion, CH
Re: Benge 290 question
They're underrated in the sense that almost everyone agrees they're good, yet they are not highly desirable for most. Not many people when looking for a horn will look specifically for one of those, or even consider buying them. They end up appealing mostly people looking for more affordable alternatives (although there are high level professionals playing them). Undervalued would be a better qualificative I guess.
Maximilien Brisson
www.maximilienbrisson.com
Lecturer for baroque trombone,
Hfk Bremen/University of the Arts Bremen
www.maximilienbrisson.com
Lecturer for baroque trombone,
Hfk Bremen/University of the Arts Bremen
-
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:10 pm
Re: Benge 290 question
Max: “although there are high level professionals playing them)”. Are there? Other than the Clevelanders 30 years ago?
- BGuttman
- Posts: 5965
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:19 am
- Location: Cow Hampshire
Re: Benge 290 question
Alan Raph played one.
Great big band bass trombones. Don't let the pro sheeple steer you. Too many pros have to deal with coworkers who listen with their eyes.
Bruce Guttman
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
- euphobone
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2020 3:36 pm
- Location: San Antonio, TX
Re: Benge 290 question
I believe the Cincinnati Symphony trombones all played on King 4Bs at some point in the late 60s. I purchased a 4B Sonorous about 15 years ago from a guy who had bought it from his trombone teacher who was with the Cincinnati Symphony, and he was the one who keyed me in to the section's use of the 4B. It was one of the best, warmest trombones I have ever played. But I was looking for a different sound at the time, and eventually sold it after I got my Silver Sonorous. I regret selling it to this day.CalgaryTbone wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 6:49 pm One small correction - by the time Benge trombones were around George Szell was long gone from Cleveland. The Cleveland section was playing King 5B's (with Anderson playing a 10.5" bell Bach). The Kings were chosen because Szell wanted German trombones, and the section weren't too happy with what they found on that front. The Kings seemed to satisfy Szell as to the sound he was looking for, and the trombonists found them to be more like the other American makes they were used to. Some of the Cleveland players did start playing the Benge trombones when they came out, as did Marcellus and some of the other National Symphony guys. The Benge trombones were quite popular for several years around the late 80's- early 90's. I remember that Jim Pugh had something to do with the small bore Benge design. I've had some students that played Benge horns who sounded quite good on them - nice instruments.
Jim Scott
Raul Escobar
1974 King 4BF Silver Sonorous
1972 King Duo Gravis, Hammond 20BLL
1985 Willson 2900BS
1974 King 4BF Silver Sonorous
1972 King Duo Gravis, Hammond 20BLL
1985 Willson 2900BS
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 4:29 pm
Re: Benge 290 question
-
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:10 pm
Re: Benge 290 question
Somebody said there was one in the Nat Symph at one time.
Mind you, if everybody played one, they’d be double the cost.
Mind you, if everybody played one, they’d be double the cost.
- spencercarran
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 1:02 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: Benge 290 question
Underpriced relative to their quality I'd agree with. Pretty common to see a near pristine 290 go for somewhere in the $1500-$2000 range, when comparable independent basses would usually fetch a higher price.LeTromboniste wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:33 am They're underrated in the sense that almost everyone agrees they're good, yet they are not highly desirable for most. Not many people when looking for a horn will look specifically for one of those, or even consider buying them. They end up appealing mostly people looking for more affordable alternatives (although there are high level professionals playing them). Undervalued would be a better qualificative I guess.
Not sure what to make of people agreeing they're good but not actually playing them. There are loads and loads of good trombones out there, and most of us can only own so many. I sort of stumbled across each of my trombones at cheap prices by luck, and expect I would've been about equally happy with Benge equivalents if those were the ones I happened across.
-
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 9:35 am
- Contact:
Re: Benge 290 question
David Finlayson won the NY Phil job on a 190, I think. I also think (not 100% sure) that Pete Norton played a 290 in Cincinnati. The late Steve Witser played one on Cleveland, and is playing it on his solo CD, with the center city brass quintet on their CDs and won the LA Phil job on it.
Frank S. Gazda
Professor of Music, Delaware State University
Freelance Low Brass, Mid-Atlantic
www.firststatebrass.com
Professor of Music, Delaware State University
Freelance Low Brass, Mid-Atlantic
www.firststatebrass.com
-
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2018 1:10 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Benge 290 question
For the premiere performance of Ezra Laderman's "Concerto for 5 Winds & Orchestra" [piccolo, English horn, bass clarinet, piccolo trumpet and bass trombone] I choose a Benge 290 over my beloved King "Duo Gravis" and King 8B. The 290 slotted right in between the clarity of the DG and the weight of the 8B. Perfect when playing in the quintet ! Two of the most enjoyable hours of listening I've ever done to a solo trombone player, was listening to Dave Finlayson on a Benge tenor on a day off with the NSO in Toronto. Impressive, indeed ! Greatly underestimated instruments !
-
- Posts: 1483
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:06 am
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
Re: Benge 290 question
They are nice horns. If it's in good shape and the price is right, why not go for it? Plenty of people love them. Well designed. It's a shame they don't make them anymore. The Benge line was well thought out, but once Conn-Selmer became a thing, they were doomed.
David S. - daveyboy37 from TTF
Bach 39, LT36B, 42BOF & 42T, King 2103 / 3b, Kanstul 1570CR & 1588CR, Yamaha YBL-612 RII, YBL-822G & YBL-830, B&H Eb Tuba, Sterling 1056GHS Euphonium,
Livingston Symphony Orchestra NJ - Trombone
Bach 39, LT36B, 42BOF & 42T, King 2103 / 3b, Kanstul 1570CR & 1588CR, Yamaha YBL-612 RII, YBL-822G & YBL-830, B&H Eb Tuba, Sterling 1056GHS Euphonium,
Livingston Symphony Orchestra NJ - Trombone
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2019 1:38 pm
Re: Benge 290 question
Obviously this horn appeals to some players more than others.
OP, if there's any way for you to try before buying, I'd do that before anything else.
OP, if there's any way for you to try before buying, I'd do that before anything else.
-
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:10 pm
Re: Benge 290 question
I’m now the owner of a Benge 290.
-
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
- Location: California
-
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:10 pm