Shires ‘Silversonic’

Post Reply
Rusty
Posts: 309
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2018 6:30 am

Shires ‘Silversonic’

Post by Rusty »

Anyone played a Shires small bore sterling silver bell? I believe they only make it as an 8” bell and there’s something like a $1500 up charge above a regular bell section price :shock:

Keen to see if anyone has tried it as a Shires 3B Silversonic type setup?
User avatar
LeTromboniste
Posts: 1034
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:22 am
Location: Sion, CH

Re: Shires ‘Silversonic’

Post by LeTromboniste »

The upcharge is not very surprising given that the price of 925 silver is 150-200 times higher than that of brass depending on the brass alloy, form and source. If a bell is normally formed from less than $10 worth of brass, it will easily have a 4-digit raw material cost in silver.
Maximilien Brisson
www.maximilienbrisson.com
Lecturer for baroque trombone,
Hfk Bremen/University of the Arts Bremen
User avatar
Matt K
Verified
Posts: 3955
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Shires ‘Silversonic’

Post by Matt K »

It's also about what a King 3BSS vs a King 3B charges. WWBW has a 3B at ~$2400 whereas a 3BSS is $3700.
User avatar
Splendour
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 10:05 am

Re: Shires ‘Silversonic’

Post by Splendour »

I haven't played one myself, but I seem to recall talking with someone who had saying they gave a brighter tone then the King Silveronic
Bach42t
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2018 9:30 pm

Re: Shires ‘Silversonic’

Post by Bach42t »

If it was me... I'd just get the real deal, King 3BSS with gold trim over the Shires. They probably come out to be the same price.
Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”