Conn 83h

Post Reply
dxhall
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 6:43 pm

Conn 83h

Post by dxhall »

Any opinions on a Conn 83h bass? There’s one on eBay now that might sell for a reasonable price. Here’s the listing:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/CG-CONN-83H-DO ... 1438.l2649
Thrawn22
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 10:18 pm

Re: Conn 83h

Post by Thrawn22 »

Its either going play like a freat 112H or a shitty 112H.


But a part of me wants to know for sure. Too bad im into dependent system horns and most preferably 70 series Conns. I would like to try an 111H.
6H (K series)
6H (early 60s)
4H/5H custom bell
78H ('53)
78H (K series)
78H/36BG /2547 slide
8H
88HN
71H (dependant valves)
72H
35H alto (K series)
chromebone
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 4:29 pm

Re: Conn 83h

Post by chromebone »

Some 83h’s are good, and some are completely unplayable. Probably depends on what day the week it was assembled. I wouldn’t buy one unless it could be tried first. The 83h was the poster child for everything that had gone wrong with Conn in the 1970’s.
I’ve heard they’re good horns if you get one that was assembled at the factory properly, or are willing to have a bad one completely taken apart and reassembled properly. But in that case, it’s easier just to get a new 62h and call it a day.
Last edited by chromebone on Fri Feb 21, 2020 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Vegastokc
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2018 7:46 am
Location: Rock Hill, SC

Re: Conn 83h

Post by Vegastokc »

Nice looking horn either way.
Michael Saffier
I ate twice as much lasagna as I should have...
User avatar
EdwardSolomon
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 5:01 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Conn 83h

Post by EdwardSolomon »

Looks good, plays terribly. I had one and got shot of it PDQ. Save your cash to buy a good instrument. The 83H isn't it.
dxhall
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 6:43 pm

Re: Conn 83h

Post by dxhall »

That’s discouraging. I guess the search will continue. I probably just need to suck it up and write a bigger check.
sf105
Posts: 259
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 12:28 pm

Re: Conn 83h

Post by sf105 »

dxhall wrote: Fri Feb 21, 2020 9:42 am That’s discouraging. I guess the search will continue. I probably just need to suck it up and write a bigger check.
Not necessarily, but you could probably do better for that kind of cash (triggers another long discussion about which horn to buy).
User avatar
paulyg
Posts: 684
Joined: Thu May 17, 2018 12:30 pm

Re: Conn 83h

Post by paulyg »

Looks craptastic for the price. As others have pointed out, there's no reason to spend money on one of these. Plenty of other basses out there.
Paul Gilles
Aerospace Engineer & Trombone Player
dxhall
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 6:43 pm

Re: Conn 83h

Post by dxhall »

I wasn’t involved in brass playing when these horns were made, so these comments make me curious. What was so bad about the 83h? Was it a poor design, poor construction, or something else?
chromebone
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 4:29 pm

Re: Conn 83h

Post by chromebone »

Conn’s quality control and assembly were less than top shelf during that time, to put it charitably. The parts and design themselves were OK, but an in-line closed wrap bass trombone needs to be carefully assembled without stress, proper alignment and clean solder joints. Maybe it wouldn’t be as big an issue with a single valve horn or even a dependent horn, but assemble a piece of spaghetti like the 83h carelessly, and you’re asking for trouble.
Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”